• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Quality of Life Research >Eliciting Utilities Using Functional Methodology: People’s Disutilities for the Adverse Outcomes of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
【24h】

Eliciting Utilities Using Functional Methodology: People’s Disutilities for the Adverse Outcomes of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

机译：使用功能方法论淘汰公用事业：人们对心肺复苏不良结果的不满

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the functional methodology of Norman H. Anderson in eliciting utilities for health outcomes. Methods: Lay people in Tours, France, rated the undesirability of 40 scenarios of possible outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on individual linear scales (Study 1) or on a single long scale (Study 2). The outcomes were either 1 of 8 undesirable outcomes, combined with 1 of 5 likelihoods, or else complete recovery, combined with the complementary likelihood. Results: The mean utilities were consistent with previous studies. On the individual level, the internal coherence of most participants’ ratings – defined as the consistency and regularity of the graphic representation of their ratings – improved in Study 1 from their 1st to their 2nd rating. The single scale took less time, but allowed participants to disregard the information about likelihood. Conclusions: Functional methodology provides a powerful means of checking on the understanding and consistency of each person whose utilities are elicited.
机译：目的：评估诺曼·安德森（Norman H. Anderson）的功能方法论，以得出有助于健康的效用。方法：法国图尔市的躺着的人以个人线性量表（研究1）或单个长期量表（研究2）对40种心肺复苏可能结果的不良情况进行了评估。结果要么是8个不良结果中的1个，再加上5种可能性中的1种，要么是完全康复，再加上互补性可能性。结果：平均效用与以前的研究一致。在个人一级，大多数参与者的评分的内部一致性（定义为评分的图形表示的一致性和规律性）在研究1中从第一级提高到第二级。单一量表花费的时间更少，但允许参与者忽略有关可能性的信息。结论：功能方法论提供了一种强有力的手段，可用来检查每个被激发效用的人的理解和一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号