• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Radiation Protection Dosimetry >THE USE OF ACTIVE PERSONAL DOSEMETERS IN INTERVENTIONAL WORKPLACES IN HOSPITALS: COMPARISON BETWEEN ACTIVE AND PASSIVE DOSEMETERS WORN SIMULTANEOUSLY BY MEDICAL STAFF
【24h】

THE USE OF ACTIVE PERSONAL DOSEMETERS IN INTERVENTIONAL WORKPLACES IN HOSPITALS: COMPARISON BETWEEN ACTIVE AND PASSIVE DOSEMETERS WORN SIMULTANEOUSLY BY MEDICAL STAFF

机译：在医院的介入工作场所使用活动个人称号计：主动和被动剂量表之间的比较由医务人员同时佩戴

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Medical staff in interventional procedures are among the professionals with the highest occupational doses. Active personal dosemeters (APDs) can help in optimizing the exposure during interventional procedures. However, there can be problems when using APDs during interventional procedures, due to the specific energy and angular distribution of the radiation field and because of the pulsed nature of the radiation. Many parameters like the type of interventional procedure, personal habits and working techniques, protection tools used and X-ray field characteristics influence the occupational exposure and the scattered radiation around the patient. In this paper, we compare the results from three types of APDs with a passive personal dosimetry system while being used in real clinical environment by the interventional staff. The results show that there is a large spread in the ratios of the passive and active devices.
机译：介入程序中的医务人员是具有最高职业剂量的专业人士。主动个人用量表（APDS）可以帮助在介入程序期间优化曝光。然而，由于辐射场的特定能量和角度分布，在介入程序期间使用APD时，可能存在问题，并且由于辐射的脉冲性质。许多参数，如介入程序类型，个人习惯和工作技术，使用的保护工具和X射线场特征影响职业暴露和患者周围的散射辐射。在本文中，我们将三种类型APDS的结果与被动个人剂量测定系统进行比较，同时由介入工作人员在真正的临床环境中使用。结果表明，被动和有源器件的比率大的差异。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Radiation Protection Dosimetry》 |2020年第1期|22-29|共8页
  • 作者

    F. Vanhavere; E. Carinou; I. Clairand; O. Ciraj-Bjelac; F. De Monte; J. Domienik-Andrzejewska; P. Ferrari; M. Ginjaume; Hrvoje Hrsak; O. Hupe; Z. Knezevic; U. OConnor; M. Sans Merce; S. Sarmento; A. Savary; T. Siskoonen;

  • 作者单位

    SCK-CEN Belgian Nuclear Research Centre Mol Belgium;

    Greek Atomic Energy Commission EEAE Agia Paraskevi Attiki Greece;

    IRSN Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safery Fontenay-Aux-Roses France;

    Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia;

    Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS Padua Italy;

    NIOM Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine Lodz Poland;

    ENEA. IRP-Radiation Protection Institute Bologna Italy;

    UPC Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya Barcelona Spain;

    University Hospital Centre Zagreb Croatia;

    Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) 38116 Braunschweig Germany;

    Ruder Boskovic Institute RBI Zagreb Croatia;

    St. James's Hospital Dublin 8 Ireland;

    CHUV Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois Lausanne Switzerland;

    Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) Porto Portugal;

    IRSN Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safery Fontenay-Aux-Roses France;

    STUK Helsinki Finland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号