• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Records management journal >Theory, regulation and practice in Swedish digital records appraisal
【24h】

Theory, regulation and practice in Swedish digital records appraisal

机译：瑞典数字记录评估中的理论，法规和实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - Digital records appraisal and aspects of archival values in theory, regulari2ation and practice are explored. This paper aims to reflect upon the appraisal process, responsibility and norms for value creation in a digitalized environment. The research question was how do appraisal theory, normative rules and appraisal practice meet the aims of values in digital archives? Design/methodology/approach - The study triangulated appraisal theory, normative values and participants' views about archival values in appraisal practice in a Swedish setting. Content analysis were used to explore normative documents and interviews. Appraisal theories of the Swedish Nils Nilsson and the Canadian Terry Cook were interpreted. The result was related to theories on public values, the nature of responsibility and relations between the state and citizens. Findings - The results show influences between theory, norms and practice. Changes in norms and practice do not follow the development of digitalization. Responsibility is focused on tasks, which exposes risks of accountability control and knowledge of appraisal grounds. The paper concludes that access requirements and user needs may prompt change in appraisal processes. In the light of digitalization, "primary and secondary value" are merely a matter of use and usability in a time and space (continuum) perspective. Research limitations/implications - This study is based in Sweden where extensive right of access to public records and default preservation are norm. Originality/value - The result shows how allocated responsibilities impinge on a re-active digital appraisal process.
机译：目的-探讨数字记录评估以及档案价值的理论，规范和实践方面。本文旨在反思数字化环境中价值创造的评估过程，责任和规范。研究的问题是评估理论，规范规则和评估实践如何满足数字档案馆的价值目标？设计/方法论/方法-该研究对评估理论，规范价值以及参与者对瑞典环境中评估实践中档案价值的观点进行了三角剖分。内容分析用于探索规范性文件和访谈。解释了瑞典的尼尔斯·尼尔森和加拿大的特里·库克的评估理论。结果与有关公共价值，责任性质以及国家与公民之间关系的理论有关。结果-结果显示了理论，规范和实践之间的影响。规范和实践的变化不随数字化的发展而变化。责任集中在任务上，这暴露了责任控制和评估依据知识的风险。本文得出的结论是，访问需求和用户需求可能会促使评估过程发生变化。从数字化的角度来看，“主要和次要价值”只是时间和空间（连续）角度的使用和可用性问题。研究的局限性/意义-这项研究基于瑞典，在该国，广泛享有公开记录和默认保存的权利。原创性/价值-结果显示分配的职责如何影响反应式数字评估过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号