【24h】

Guest editorial

机译:客座社论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Information governance (IG) is a multidisciplinary approach to managing information, which has emerged over the past decade and continues to develop. With the rise of new technologies, we have seen the value of information receiving greater prominence and increasingly being commoditized (World Economic Forum, 2011). Information is now often co-created across global boundaries and blurred personal and public spaces, with complex ownership and legal regimes impacting. In response, frameworks to underpin the delivery of information through time have increasingly acknowledged the diversity of professional expertise needed to support a wide range of information contexts, including, for example, archivists, digital curators, digital forensics experts, IT support, lawyers, librarians, records managers, software engineers and technical infrastructure engineers (Makhlouf Shabou et at, 2017). Some frameworks have re-envisaged their profession and rebranded it IG, e.g. COBIT 5 (ISACA, 2012), which aligns the IT sector with information security, and the ARMA Information Governance Maturity Model, which aligns records management with IG (ARMA International, 2010). Others have perhaps underplayed the role of IG, representing it only as a niche component of information delivery, for example, the CILIP Professional Knowledge and Skills Base model defines IG as delivery within the information rights law space (CILIP, 2019), which does denote its significance for legal and ethical information delivery. While each of these models articulates a valuable aspect of IG delivery, it is important not to ignore the bigger implications of IG. IG is an overarching domain that acknowledges wide-ranging needs and complex relationships to manage information for the benefit of society.
机译:信息治理(IG)是一种用于管理信息的多学科方法,在过去的十年中已经出现并且正在不断发展。随着新技术的兴起,我们已经看到信息的价值越来越受到重视,并日益被商品化(世界经济论坛,2011)。现在,信息通常是跨全球边界,模糊的个人和公共空间共同创建的,复杂的所有权和法律制度会产生影响。作为回应,支持通过时间传递信息的框架越来越认识到支持广泛信息环境所需的专业知识的多样性,例如,档案管理员,数字策展人,数字取证专家,IT支持,律师,图书馆员,记录经理,软件工程师和技术基础架构工程师(Makhlouf Shabou等,2017年)。一些框架重新设想了他们的职业,并将其重新命名为IG,例如COBIT 5(ISACA,2012年)使IT部门与信息安全保持一致; ARMA信息治理成熟度模型使记录管理与IG保持一致(ARMA International,2010年)。其他人可能没有充分发挥IG的作用,仅将其表示为信息交付的利基组成部分,例如,CILIP专业知识和技能基础模型将IG定义为信息权法律领域内的交付(CILIP,2019),这确实表明其对于法律和道德信息传递的意义。尽管每个模型都阐明了IG交付的重要方面,但重要的是不要忽略IG的更大含义。 IG是一个公认的领域,它认识到广泛的需求和复杂的关系,以管理信息以造福社会。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Records management journal》 |2019年第2期|2-4|共3页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Information Studies, University College London, London, UK;

    Department of Information Sciences, Geneva School of Business Administration, Geneva, Switzerland;

    Department of Information Sciences, Geneva School of Business Administration, Geneva, Switzerland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号