• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Records management journal >What will be the next records management orthodoxy?
【24h】

What will be the next records management orthodoxy?

机译：接下来的记录管理正统观念是什么？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - The electronic document and records management system model (EDRMS) served for most of the noughties (the decade from the year 2000) as an orthodoxy that united the records management profession. The purpose of this paper is to address two questions: "Does the stagnation and retreat of the EDRMS model towards the end of the noughties call into doubt the theory that lay behind that model, namely DIRKS and the records continuum?", and "Is a new records management orthodoxy likely to emerge over the course of the next five years, and if so what form might it take?". Design/methodology /approach - The paper looks back at the author's readings of DIRKS and the records management continuum at different times over the period 1993-2010, and links those readings with the prevailing fortunes of the EDRMS model that was build on top of that theory. It gives a personal perspective of a consultant/practitioner on the chances of a new records management orthodoxy arising in the course of the next five years.rnFindings - The loss of momentum of the EDRMS model does not invalidate the insights of DIRKS and the records continuum. Both frameworks support alternative readings from those that underpinned the EDRMS model. But any future orthodoxy is likely to be less directly derived from theory. One possible future orthodoxy is the "records repository model" - where a business classification scheme is held in a back end system, and applied to content held in the various applications used by colleagues. However this model has not yet received sufficient practitioner attention, and there are unanswered questions as to how it would work in practice. Originality/value - The paper looks at the ways in which the records management community has used orthodoxies in both theory and implementation models to keep itself united during an extended period of upheaval and change since the commencement of the networked digital age. It outlines the challenge of finding a records management orthodoxy that is both consistent with record keeping theory and also workable and sustainable in the rapidly changing world of enterprise computing.
机译：目的-电子文档和记录管理系统模型（EDRMS）作为结合了记录管理专业的正统观念，已经服务于大多数情况（从2000年开始的十年）。本文的目的是要解决两个问题：“ EDRMS模型在上世纪90年代末期的停滞和退缩是否会质疑该模型背后的理论，即DIRKS和记录连续性？”和“是否一个新的记录管理正统观念可能会在未来五年内出现，如果是这样，它将采取什么形式？”。设计/方法/方法-本文回顾了作者在1993-2010年不同时间段对DIRKS的阅读以及记录管理的连续性，并将这些阅读与基于EDRMS模型的主要运势联系在一起。理论。它提供了顾问/从业人员对未来五年内新记录管理正统观念出现的机会的个人看法。rn发现-EDRMS模型失去动力并不会使DIRKS的见解和记录连续性失效。这两个框架都支持EDRMS模型的替代读物。但是任何未来的正统观念都不太可能直接从理论中得出。一种可能的未来正统观念是“记录存储库模型”，其中的业务分类方案保存在后端系统中，并应用于同事使用的各种应用程序中保存的内容。但是，该模型尚未引起实践者的足够重视，并且在实践中如何运作尚有未解决的问题。原创性/价值-本文探讨了在网络数字化时代开始以来的长期动荡和变化时期，记录管理社区在理论和实现模型中都使用正统观念来保持自身团结的方式。它概述了找到一个既符合记录保存理论又要在迅速变化的企业计算世界中可行且可持续的记录管理传统方法所面临的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号