首页> 外文期刊>Records management journal >An evaluation of MoReq2 in the context of national EDRMS standard developments in the UK and Europe
【24h】

An evaluation of MoReq2 in the context of national EDRMS standard developments in the UK and Europe

机译:在英国和欧洲的国家EDRMS标准制定的背景下对MoReq2进行评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to show the differences between European ElectronicrnDocument and Records Management System (EDRMS) standards in Europe with special focus onrnMoReq2 and TNA 2002 and to explore the benefits and problems of superseding national standards byrna European model.rnDesign/methodology/approach - Interviews were conducted with 18 key stakeholders fromrnacross Europe. The qualitative method was chosen for the open-ended interviews.rnFindings - There is a wide range of opinions on national and European standards. MoReq2 is widelyrnvalued as a comprehensive and modern standard. Some interviewees indicated that the standard didrncreate a culture of overregulation and was too detailed. Market impact depends on the compliancerntesting regime and legislation.rnOriginality/value - Within the field of EDRMS standards there has been limited research. Thisrnpaper presents the first comparison of TNA 2002 and MoReq2. In addition it evaluates the economicrnimpact EDRMS standards can have on vendors and users of these systems.
机译:目的-本文的目的是展示欧洲的欧洲电子文档和记录管理系统(EDRMS)标准之间的差异,特别侧重于rnMoReq2和TNA 2002,并通过欧洲模型探索取代国家标准的好处和问题。rn设计/方法/方法-与来自欧洲各地的18位主要利益相关者进行了访谈。不限成员名额的访谈选择了定性方法。rn结果-有关国家和欧洲标准的意见广泛。 MoReq2被广泛认为是一种全面的现代标准。一些受访者表示,该标准确实造成了过度监管的文化,而且过于详尽。市场影响取决于合规性测试制度和法规。原创性/价值-在EDRMS标准领域内,研究有限。本文介绍了TNA 2002和MoReq2的首次比较。此外,它还评估了EDRMS标准对这些系统的供应商和用户的经济影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号