...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Regional Environmental Change >The climate change dilemma: big science, the globalizing of climate and the loss of the human scale
【24h】

The climate change dilemma: big science, the globalizing of climate and the loss of the human scale

机译：气候变化的困境：科学大，气候全球化和人类规模的丧失

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper explores a crucial dilemma behind the failure of climate politics: the dehumanization of the concept of climate, i.e., the emergence of a predominance of global perspectives, conceptions, and knowledge of climate, which do not translate into local knowledge, experience, and political action. On the one hand, twentieth-century climate science improved understanding of global climate change tremendously. On the other hand, it focused on reductionist quantification and modeling and emphasis on large spatial and temporal scales. This research direction produced large- and global-scale knowledge and can aptly be described as knowledge from above. Climatology in its original Humboldtian conception, in contrast, focused on detailed local information. The human dimension-the support of human affairs-was at the core of it. This understanding of climatology involved priority of local-scale knowledge and can be regarded a version of knowledge from below, which still predominated in the first half of the twentieth century. In my paper, I will explore the question how the understanding of climate was dehumanized by globalizing research approaches and scientific conceptions through the twentieth century. Scientific and political interests pushed a globalizing agenda and produced a conceptual and discursive detachment of climate knowledge from human scales. The paper argues that it is important to understand the historical and ideological foundation of knowledge from above and its epistemic and social authority, if we aim at re-establishing recognition of knowledge from below and the lost links between both types of knowledge.
机译：本文探讨了气候政治失败背后的一个关键困境：气候概念的非人性化，即出现了全球性的观点，概念和气候知识，这并没有转化为当地的知识，经验和知识。政治行动。一方面，二十世纪的气候科学极大地增进了人们对全球气候变化的理解。另一方面，它着重于还原论的量化和建模，并着重于大的时空尺度。该研究方向产生了大规模和全球性的知识，可以适当地描述为来自上方的知识。相比之下，气候学在其最初的洪堡语概念中着重于详细的本地信息。人的维度是人类事务的支持，这是它的核心。对气候学的这种理解涉及本地知识的优先考虑，并且可以被认为是来自下面的知识的一种版本，这种知识在20世纪上半叶仍然占主导地位。在我的论文中，我将探讨以下问题：如何通过在20世纪使研究方法和科学概念全球化来使对气候的理解变得非人性化。科学和政治利益推动了全球化议程，并在概念上和话语上使气候知识脱离了人类规模。本文认为，如果我们旨在重新建立对自下而上的知识的认识以及这两种知识之间失去联系的目的，那么从上层了解知识的历史和思想基础以及其认识和社会权威很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号