首页> 外文期刊>Reliability Engineering & System Safety >Comparison of modeling formalisms for Safety Analyses: SAML and AltaRica
【24h】

Comparison of modeling formalisms for Safety Analyses: SAML and AltaRica

机译:安全分析的建模形式比较:SAML和AltaRica

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many states/transitions formalisms have been proposed in the literature to perform Safety Analyses. In this paper we compare two of them: SAML and AltaRica. These formalisms have been developed by different communities. Their "look-and-feel" are thus quite different. Yet, their underlying mathematical foundations are very similar: both of them rely on state automata. It is therefore of interest to study their ability to assess the reliability of systems, their respective advantages and drawbacks and to seek for opportunities of a cross fertilization. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:文献中已经提出了许多州/过渡形式主义来进行安全性分析。在本文中,我们比较了其中两个:SAML和AltaRica。这些形式主义是由不同的社区开发的。因此,它们的“外观”完全不同。但是,它们的基本数学基础非常相似:它们都依赖于状态自动机。因此,研究它们评估系统可靠性的能力,它们各自的优点和缺点以及寻找交叉施肥的机会是令人感兴趣的。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号