首页> 外文期刊>Reliability Engineering & System Safety >Perspectives on the nexus between good risk communication and high scientific risk analysis quality
【24h】

Perspectives on the nexus between good risk communication and high scientific risk analysis quality

机译:良好的风险沟通与较高的科学风险分析质量之间的关系透视

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In general, successful risk communication can be said to require "an understanding of the target audience, including the best means for reaching the audience: a credible or trusted source; and a message that has ideally been pre-tested to ensure its effectiveness" [43]. The scientific quality of the risk analysis is not questioned. The sources can be credible or trusted, but the scientific risk analysis quality can be poor. For example, the risk communication can be based on a scientifically unsound risk characterisation, yet be communicated successfully if the reference is a communication perspective as above. Good risk communication cannot, however, be seen in isolation from the broader process of risk analysis and management. The present paper provides some reflections on this topic, the main aim being to strengthen the argumentation for the thesis that scientific and foundational issues of risk analysis are critical for the successful communication of risk. Several examples are used to demonstrate this thesis.
机译:通常,可以说成功的风险交流需要“了解目标受众,包括达到目标受众的最佳方法:可信或可信赖的消息来源;以及经过理想测试的消息,以确保其有效性” [ 43]。毫无疑问,风险分析的科学质量。来源可能是可信的或可信赖的,但科学的风险分析质量可能很差。例如,风险交流可以基于科学上不合理的风险特征,但如果参考文献是上述交流观点,则可以成功交流。但是,不能将良好的风险沟通与更广泛的风险分析和管理过程隔离开来。本文对这一主题进行了一些思考,主要目的是为了加强论点,即认为风险分析的科学和基础问题对于成功地传达风险至关重要。举几个例子来说明本论文。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Reliability Engineering & System Safety》 |2018年第10期|290-296|共7页
  • 作者

    Aven Terje;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号