...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Training the scientific workforce: Does funding mechanism matter?
【24h】

Training the scientific workforce: Does funding mechanism matter?

机译：培训科学劳动力：资金机制重要吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A National Institutes of Health (NIH) taskforce recently recommended decreasing the number of graduate students supported on research assistantships, and instead favoring traineeship and fellowship funding mechanisms. Using instrumental variables estimation with survey data collected from U.S. PhD-granting biomedical sciences departments and their newly-minted PhDs, we find that increases in these programs' NIH-funded traineeships and fellowships do significantly increase programs' total graduate enrollments, particularly of female students. However, PhDs who were funded primarily as research assistants are significantly more likely to take research-focused jobs in the U.S. scientific workforce after they graduate, as compared to PhDs who were primarily supported as trainees or fellows. The suggested policy changes thus may have unintended, negative consequences for scientific workforce participation.
机译：美国国家卫生研究院（NIH）的一个工作组最近建议减少获得研究助学金支持的研究生人数，转而支持见习生和研究金资助机制。使用工具变量估计值和从获得美国博士学位的生物医学科学部门及其新攻读的博士学位收集的调查数据得出的结果，我们发现这些计划的由NIH资助的培训和研究金的增加确实大大增加了计划的毕业生总入学率，尤其是女学生。但是，与主要由受训者或研究员支持的博士相比，主要由研究助理资助的博士毕业后更有可能在美国科学劳动力中从事以研究为重点的工作。因此，建议的政策更改可能会对科学工作人员的参与产生意想不到的负面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号