首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Complements and substitutes in profiting from innovation-A choice experimental approach
【24h】

Complements and substitutes in profiting from innovation-A choice experimental approach

机译:创新中的互补与替代-一种选择实验方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The ability of firms to effectively use mechanisms that support them in profiting from technological innovation is key to outperforming competitors. Yet, such mechanisms have, for the most part, been studied in isolation, without accounting for interactions between them. We address this gap by developing a conjoint-based method to study such interactions, and by applying it to analyze interactions between product-related patents and three other appropriability mechanisms. To this end, we conduct and analyze a series of discrete choice experiments with 319 managers within a leading international communications equipment company. As a result, we find the number of product-related patents to be complementary to the overall size of the patent portfolio and complementary—with an interesting exception—to contributions to open standards. We also find indications of a substitutive interaction with lead time advantages. Hence, the effectiveness of patents seems to be leveraged by controlled diffusion of the underlying technologies and by the size of the firm's patent portfolio, a finding that may contribute to explaining the patent paradox. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.
机译:公司有效使用支持其从技术创新中获利的机制的能力,是超越竞争对手的关键。然而,在大多数情况下,这种机制是孤立地研究的,没有考虑它们之间的相互作用。我们通过开发一种基于联合的方法来研究这种相互作用,并将其应用于分析产品相关专利与其他三个专有机制之间的相互作用,从而解决了这一空白。为此,我们与一家领先的国际通信设备公司中的319名管理人员进行并分析了一系列离散选择实验。结果,我们发现与产品相关的专利数量可以与专利组合的整体规模相辅相成,并且与开放标准的贡献相辅相成(一个有趣的例外)。我们还发现了具有提前期优势的替代性相互作用的迹象。因此,似乎可以通过基础技术的受控扩散以及公司专利组合的规模来利用专利的有效性,这一发现可能有助于解释专利悖论。理论和管理意义进行了讨论。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Research policy》 |2013年第2期|326-339|共14页
  • 作者

    Timo Fischer; Joachim Henkel;

  • 作者单位

    TUM School of Management, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Arasstr, 21, D-80333 Munich, Germany;

    TUM School of Management, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Arasstr, 21, D-80333 Munich, Germany,Center for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London, United Kingdom;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    profiting from innovation; value appropriation; patents; complementarity; patent paradox;

    机译:从创新中获利;价值分配;专利;互补性专利悖论;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号