• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Effects of the durability of scientific literature at the group level: Case study of chemistry research groups in the Netherlands
【24h】

Effects of the durability of scientific literature at the group level: Case study of chemistry research groups in the Netherlands

机译：科学文献的持久性在小组水平上的影响：荷兰化学研究小组的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this study an analysis of the effects of the different types of durability on the bibliometric performance at the group level is presented. The scientific production during the period of 1991-2000 of a set of 158 Dutch research groups in chemistry is studied considering several bibliometric indicators in the perspective of the durability of the publications in terms of the citations received. Two citation windows have been considered for the analysis of the effect of the enlargement of the citation period, one including the citations received in the same period of publications (1991-2000) and a second one including eight years more (1991-2008). In addition, qualitative indicators provided by a committee of experts who evaluated the research groups have been analyzed in order to study the relationship between qualitative indicators and quantitative measures, in particular these of durability. Results show that production with "normal" durability is the most rewarded both according to bibliometric indicators and qualitative assessments given by experts. We also find that publications with a delayed pattern do not represent a major problem in the assessment of research groups, as those groups with a higher share of this type of publications do not improve their assessment when the citation window is substantially enlarged. Several discussions are presented regarding the importance of durability analysis in the framework of research assessment situations.
机译：在这项研究中，分析了不同类型的耐用性对小组级别的文献计量性能的影响。在1991-2000年期间，对一组158个荷兰化学研究小组的科学生产进行了研究，从出版物的耐用性角度考虑了几个文献计量指标，并根据收到的引用量进行了研究。已考虑使用两个引文窗口来分析引文时间扩大的影响，一个引文窗口包括同一时期（1991-2000年）收到的引文，另一个引文窗口包含八年以上的引文（1991-2008年）。此外，还对由评估研究小组的专家委员会提供的定性指标进行了分析，以研究定性指标和定量指标之间的关系，尤其是耐久性指标。结果表明，根据文献计量学指标和专家给出的定性评估，具有“正常”耐久性的产品获得的回报最高。我们还发现，具有延迟模式的出版物在评估研究小组中并不构成主要问题，因为当引文窗口大幅扩大时，这类出版物中具有较高份额的那些小组不会改善其评估。提出了一些关于耐久性分析在研究评估情况框架中的重要性的讨论。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Research policy》 |2013年第4期|886-894|共9页
  • 作者

    Rodrigo Costas; Thed N. van Leeuwen; Anthony F.J. van Raan;

  • 作者单位

    Leiden University, Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Wassenaarseweg 624, 2333AL Leiden, The Netherlands;

    Leiden University, Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Wassenaarseweg 624, 2333AL Leiden, The Netherlands;

    Leiden University, Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Wassenaarseweg 624, 2333AL Leiden, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    research evaluation; research groups; durability of scientific publications; obsolescence;

    机译：研究评估;研究小组;科学出版物的持久性;过时的;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号