首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature
【24h】

Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature

机译:科学会推动技术发展吗?引用科学文献的专利

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent years, there has been a trend towards a science and technology policy that is applied in nature. In times of growing public discontent about high taxation and budget deficits, even basic science needs to document industry relevance. Counting patents apparently related to basic research activities through citations would be one way of measuring the relevance of basic research to industry. This has become especially interesting since Narin et al. [Narin, F., Hamilto, K.S., Olivastro, D., 1995. Linkage between agency supported research and patented industrial technology. Research Evaluation 5 (3), 183-187.] observed an increasing linkage between US technology and public science. The results of Narin et al. indicate a growing relationship between science and technology in a very general way. This idea of an increasingly science-based technology might convey the impression that there is direct knowledge-transfer taking place that is reflected in citations to scientific research papers in patents. A study of front pages of patents in the field of nanoscale technologies suggests that citation linkages hardly represent a direct link between cited paper and citing patent.
机译:近年来,朝着在自然界应用科学技术政策的趋势发展。在公众日益增加对高税收和预算赤字的不满情绪之际,即使是基础科学也需要记录行业相关性。通过引用对与基础研究活动明显相关的专利进行计数将是衡量基础研究与行业相关性的一种方法。自Narin等人以来,这变得特别有趣。 [Narin,F.,Hamilto,K.S.,Olivastro,D.,1995。代理机构支持的研究与专利工业技术之间的联系。研究评估5(3),183-187。]观察到美国技术与公共科学之间的联系日益紧密。 Narin等人的结果。以非常普遍的方式表明科学与技术之间的关系在不断发展。这种越来越以科学为基础的技术的想法可能会传达一种印象,即直接进行知识转移,这反映在对专利的科学研究论文的引用中。一项对纳米技术领域的专利头版的研究表明,引用链接几乎不能代表被引用论文与引用专利之间的直接联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号