...
首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Suborning science for profit: Monsanto, glyphosate, and private science research misconduct
【24h】

Suborning science for profit: Monsanto, glyphosate, and private science research misconduct

机译:利润的山脉科学:Monsanto,草甘膦和私人科学研究不当行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using documents from a lawsuit filed against the agricultural chemical and biotechnology firm Monsanto (now Bayer), we document a private firm's efforts to distort the scientific peer-review process through ghostwriting, to orchestrate campaigns to retract journal articles, and to influence editorial decisions. The firm's apparent goal was to manipulate the regulatory process so that it could continue selling a product that the firm's own research indicated might be dangerous. The long-term impact has been to threaten the integrity of scientific peer review and public trust in science. The findings have implications for public-private research collaborations, the validity of private-science research, scientific journal policies on conflict-of-interest disclosures, and policies governing the role of private science in regulatory oversight.
机译:利用诉讼中提起的诉讼文件蒙森(现在拜耳),我们记录了私人公司通过Ghostwriting扭曲科学同伴审查过程的努力,以协调撤回期刊文章,并影响编辑决策。 该公司的明显目标是操纵监管过程,以便继续销售公司自己的研究表明可能是危险的产品。 长期影响一直威胁到科学同行审查和公众对科学的诚信。 该调查结果对公私研究合作,私人科学研究的有效性,科学杂志政策对利益冲突披露的政策以及私人科学在监管监督中的作用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Research policy》 |2021年第7期|104290.1-104290.10|共10页
  • 作者

    Leland Glenna; Analena Bruce;

  • 作者单位

    The Pennsylvania State University 114 Armsby Building University Park PA 16802 United States;

    University of New Hampshire United States;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号