首页> 外文期刊>Resource recycling >EPR IS THE ANSWER
【24h】

EPR IS THE ANSWER

机译:EPR是答案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The debates around extended producer responsibility for packaging - an approach whereby consumer goods companies pay some or all of the costs for managing packaging materials - have been raging in the U.S. for more than six years. During this time, UPSTREAM has organized, facilitated, and participated in multiple dialogues and forums with consumer brands, policymakers, public interest groups, local governments, packaging suppliers and waste and recycling companies. While there has been significant opposition from most affected consumer goods companies, there has also been a slow but steady groundswell of support from local and state governments, as well as an increasing openness from other business sectors, especially in the last year. Below, we'll lay out the details on this growth of EPR acceptance in the U.S. and describe why the plastics recycling sector has good reason to get on board with the policy push.
机译:围绕生产者扩大包装责任的争论已经展开了六年之久,这种争论是消费品公司支付部分或全部包装材料管理费用的一种方法。在此期间,UPSTREAM与消费者品牌,政策制定者,公共利益团体,地方政府,包装供应商以及废物和回收公司组织,协助并参加了多次对话和论坛。尽管受影响最大的消费品公司表示了强烈反对,但地方和州政府的支持也缓慢而稳定,并且其他业务部门的开放度不断提高,尤其是在去年。下面,我们将详细介绍美国EPR接受度的增长,并说明为什么塑料回收行业有充分的理由参与政策推动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号