首页> 外文期刊>Resource recycling >Single-stream recycling: Assessing the trade-offs
【24h】

Single-stream recycling: Assessing the trade-offs

机译:单流回收:评估权衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Opinions differ. Single-stream recycling collection and processing is either the demise of recycling or its salvation for the future. As with most things, neither of these extremes is completely true - and as in most things in solid waste management, no one best system suits every location. While many assert that single-stream service leads to increases in recycling tonnage, improve collection efficiency and save on collection cost, others argue that single-stream programs lead to: 1.Increases in processing costs; 2. Increases in contamination to levels unacceptable to end users; 3. Negative market impacts (costs and load rejections). Each of the aforementioned criticisms ring true in some communities; however, decision-making should be based on reliable analyses rather than merely on individual case studies. Program decision-making needs verifiable results, input on the relative sizes of the various impacts and the trade-offs on tons, costs and cost-effectiveness associated with single-stream - and careful analysis is needed to examine these issues.
机译:意见不同。单流回收和处理要么是回收的消亡,要么是对未来的拯救。与大多数情况一样,这两种极端情况都不是完全正确的-就像固体废物管理中的大多数情况一样,没有一个最佳的系统适合每个位置。许多人认为单流服务会增加回收吨位,提高收集效率并节省收集成本,但其他人则认为单流服务会导致:1.处理成本增加; 2.污染增加到最终用户无法接受的水平; 3.负面的市场影响(成本和甩负荷)。上述批评在某些社区中都是正确的。但是,决策应该基于可靠的分析,而不仅仅是基于个案研究。计划决策需要可验证的结果,各种影响的相对大小的输入以及与单流相关的吨,成本和成本效益的权衡取舍-需要仔细分析以检查这些问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号