...
首页> 外文期刊>Review of Income and Wealth >DISTRIBUTIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF COMMODITY PRICE SHOCKS: AUSTRALIA OVER A CENTURY
【24h】

DISTRIBUTIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF COMMODITY PRICE SHOCKS: AUSTRALIA OVER A CENTURY

机译:商品价格冲击的分布后果:一个世纪以来的澳大利亚

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper studies the distributional impact of commodity price shocks over the short and the very long run. Using a GARCH model, we find that Australia experienced more volatility than many commodity exporting developing countries over the periods 1865-1940 and 1960-2008. We conduct cointegration tests to assess the commodity price shock inequality nexus. A single equation error correction model suggests that commodity price shocks increase the income share of the top 1, 0.05, and 0.01 percent in the short run. The very top end of the income distribution benefits from commodity booms disproportionately more than the rest of the society. The short run effect is mainly driven by wool and mining and not agricultural commodities. A sustained increase in the price of renewables (wool) reduces inequality whereas the same for non-renewable resources (minerals) increases inequality. We expect that the initial distribution of land and mineral resources explains the asymmetric result.
机译:本文研究了短期和长期内商品价格冲击的分布影响。使用GARCH模型,我们发现,在1865-1940年和1960-2008年期间,澳大利亚比许多商品出口发展中国家经历了更大的波动。我们进行协整检验以评估商品价格冲击不平等的联系。一个单一的方程式误差校正模型表明,商品价格冲击在短期内增加了收入最高的1%,0.05%和0.01%的收入份额。收入分配的最高端得益于大宗商品的繁荣,其收益远超过社会其他阶层。短期效应主要是由羊毛和采矿业驱动,而不是农产品。可再生能源(羊毛)价格的持续上涨减少了不平等,而不可再生资源(矿物)的价格上涨则加剧了不平等。我们期望土地和矿产资源的初始分布可以解释这种不对称的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号