• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >Rethinking Vulnerability Analysis and Governance with Emphasis on a Participatory Approach
【24h】

Rethinking Vulnerability Analysis and Governance with Emphasis on a Participatory Approach

机译：以参与式方法为重点的漏洞分析和治理的重新思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article draws on vulnerability analysis as it emerged as a complement to classical risk analysis, and it aims at exploring its ability for nurturing risk and vulnerability governance actions. An analysis of the literature on vulnerability analysis allows us to formulate a three-fold critique: first, vulnerability analysis has been treated separately in the natural and the technological hazards fields. This separation prevents vulnerability from unleashing the full range of its potential, as it constrains appraisals into artificial categories and thus already closes down the outcomes of the analysis. Second, vulnerability analysis focused on assessment tools that are mainly quantitative, whereas qualitative appraisal is a key to assessing vulnerability in a comprehensive way and to informing policy making. Third, a systematic literature review of case studies reporting on participatory approaches to vulnerability analysis allows us to argue that participation has been important to address the above, but it remains too closed down in its approach and would benefit from embracing a more open, encompassing perspective. Therefore, we suggest rethinking vulnerability analysis as one part of a dynamic process between opening-up and closing-down strategies, in order to support a vulnerability governance framework.
机译：本文利用了作为经典风险分析的补充的脆弱性分析，其目的是探索其培育风险和脆弱性治理措施的能力。对脆弱性分析文献的分析使我们可以提出三方面的批评：首先，脆弱性分析在自然和技术危害领域已被分别对待。这种分离可以防止脆弱性发挥其全部潜力，因为它会将评估限制为人为的类别，因此已经关闭了分析的结果。其次，脆弱性分析的重点是评估工具，这些评估工具主要是定量的，而定性评估是全面评估脆弱性和为决策提供依据的关键。第三，对参与式脆弱性分析方法的案例研究进行系统的文献综述使我们认为，参与对于解决上述问题非常重要，但参与性仍然过于封闭，将受益于采用更加开放，包容的观点。因此，我们建议将漏洞分析重新考虑为开放和关闭策略之间动态过程的一部分，以支持漏洞治理框架。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Risk analysis》 |2015年第1期|129-141|共13页
  • 作者

    Nicolas Rossignol; Pierre Delvenne; Catrinel Turcanu;

  • 作者单位

    SPIRAL Research Center, Political Science Department, University of Liege, Belgium ,Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK·CEN), Society and Policy Support Group, Mol, Belgium ,Political Science Department, Boulevard du Rectorat 7,4000, Liege, Belgium;

    SPIRAL Research Center, Political Science Department, University of Liege, Belgium;

    Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK·CEN), Society and Policy Support Group, Mol, Belgium;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Governance; participation; vulnerability analysis;

    机译：治理;参与脆弱性分析;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号