• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >A Response to Richard Williams and Keith Hall's Review of Does Regulation Kill Jobs?
【24h】

A Response to Richard Williams and Keith Hall's Review of Does Regulation Kill Jobs?

机译：理查德·威廉姆斯和基思·霍尔对法规是否杀死工作的评论的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We appreciate that the review by Richard Williams and Keith Hall emphasizes the breadth of topics and perspectives in our volume, and we wholeheartedly agree with them that it is important to move beyond giving lip service to the job impacts from regulation. As we and they agree, current analytical practice really does not allow society to do anything other than either treat job impacts as essentially "worth mentioning but not worth redesigning regulations in response to" or as "unquantifiable but so important that they trump all other considerations of cost and benefit." We also agree that estimating the net number of jobs lost or gained, and multiplying this by the typical value of each change in employment, is not sufficient, given that these impacts are measured in human welfare ("lost income, health costs, and misery," as the reviewers aptly summarize) and hence must be placed in the context of distributional concerns. Transfers of wealth cannot be evaluated without knowing something about who benefits and who bears the costs, and whether the benefits flow from rich to poor or vice versa.
机译：我们赞赏理查德·威廉姆斯（Richard Williams）和基思·霍尔（Keith Hall）的评论强调了本书中主题和观点的广度，我们衷心地同意他们的观点，重要的是超越口头服务来应对法规对工作的影响。正如我们和他们所同意的那样，当前的分析实践实际上不允许社会做任何其他事情，除了将工作影响视为“值得一提，但不值得重新设计法规以应对”或“无法量化但非常重要，以至于他们超越所有其他考虑因素”。成本和收益。”我们还同意，估计损失或获得的工作净数量，并将其乘以每次就业变化的典型值是不够的，因为这些影响是以人类福祉衡量的（“收入损失，健康成本和苦难” ”作为评论者的恰当总结），因此必须放在分配问题的背景下。如果不了解谁获利，谁承担成本，以及收益是否从富人流向穷人或反之亦然，就无法评估财富的转移。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Risk analysis》 |2015年第1期|174176-177|共3页
  • 作者

    Cary Coglianese; Adam M. Finkel; Christopher Carrigan;

  • 作者单位

    Penn Program on Regulation, University of Pennsylvania Law School, Philadelphia, PA, USA;

    Penn Program on Regulation, University of Pennsylvania Law School, Philadelphia, PA, USA;

    Trachtenberg School of Public Policy and Public Administration, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号