• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >Stakeholders' Perspective on Ecological Modeling in Environmental Risk Assessment of Pesticides: Challenges and Opportunities
【24h】

Stakeholders' Perspective on Ecological Modeling in Environmental Risk Assessment of Pesticides: Challenges and Opportunities

机译：利益相关者对农药环境风险评估中的生态模型的看法：挑战和机遇

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The article closely examines the role of mechanistic effect models (e.g., population models) in the European environmental risk assessment (ERA) of pesticides. We studied perspectives of three stakeholder groups on population modeling in ERA of pesticides. Forty-three in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders from regulatory authorities, industry, and academia all over Europe. The key informant approach was employed in recruiting our participants. They were first identified as key stakeholders in the field and then sampled by means of a purposive sampling, where each stakeholder identified as important by others was interviewed and asked to suggest another potential participant for our study. Our results show that participants, although having different institutional backgrounds often presented similar perspectives and concerns about modeling. Analysis of repeating ideas and keywords revealed that all stakeholders had very high and often contradicting expectations from models. Still, all three groups expected effect models to become integrated in future ERA of pesticides. Main hopes associated with effect models were to reduce the amount of expensive and complex testing and field monitoring, both at the product development stage, and as an aid to develop mitigation measures. Our analysis suggests that, although the needs of stakeholders often overlapped, subtle differences and lack of trust hinder the process of introducing mechanistic effect models into ERA.
机译：这篇文章仔细研究了机械效应模型（例如人口模型）在欧洲农药环境风险评估（ERA）中的作用。我们研究了农药利益相关者群体建模中三个利益相关者群体的观点。与来自欧洲各地监管机构，行业和学术界的利益相关者进行了43次深入，半结构化的采访。关键的信息提供者方法被用来招募我们的参与者。首先，他们被确定为该领域的主要利益相关者，然后通过有目的的抽样方式进行抽样，在该抽样中，对每个被他人识别为重要的利益相关者进行了采访，并被要求为我们的研究建议其他潜在参与者。我们的结果表明，尽管参与者具有不同的机构背景，但他们通常对建模提出相似的观点和关注。对重复的想法和关键词的分析表明，所有利益相关者的期望值很高，并且常常与模型的期望相矛盾。尽管如此，所有这三个小组都希望将效果模型纳入农药的未来ERA中。与效果模型相关的主要希望是减少产品开发阶段的昂贵且复杂的测试和现场监视的数量，并帮助制定缓解措施。我们的分析表明，尽管利益相关者的需求经常重叠，但是细微的差异和缺乏信任阻碍了将机制效应模型引入ERA的过程。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Risk analysis》 |2013年第1期|68-79|共12页
  • 作者

    Agnieszka D. Hunka; Mattia Meli; Amalie Thit; Annemette Palmqvist; Pernille Thorbek; Valery E. Forbes;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, Roskilde University, Universitetsvej 1, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark;

    Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, Roskilde University, Universitetsvej 1, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark;

    Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, Roskilde University, Universitetsvej 1, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark;

    Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, Roskilde University, Universitetsvej 1, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark;

    Syngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Brack-nell, Berkshire, RG42 6EY, UK;

    School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska Lincoln, 348 Manter Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588-0118;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    ecological models; population models; risk assessment; stakeholder views;

    机译：生态模型人口模型;风险评估;利益相关者的观点;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号