• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >The Constitution Of Risk Communication In Advanced Liberal Societies
【24h】

The Constitution Of Risk Communication In Advanced Liberal Societies

机译：先进的自由社会的风险交流构成

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article aims to bring to the fore some of the underlying rationales that inform common conceptions of the constitution of risk communication in academic and policy communities. "Normative," "instrumental," and "substantive" imperatives typically employed in the utilization of risk communication are first outlined. In light of these considerations, a theoretical scheme is subsequently devised leading to the articulation of four fundamental "idealized" models of risk communication termed the "risk message" model, the "risk dialogue" model, the "risk field" model, and the "risk government" model, respectively. It is contended that the diverse conceptual foundations underlying the orientation of each model suggest a further need for a more contextualized view of risk communication that takes account not only of the strengths and limitations of different formulations and functions of risk communication, but also the underlying knowledge/power dynamics that underlie its constitution. In particular, it is hoped that the reflexive theoretical understanding presented here will help to bring some much needed conceptual clarity to academic and policy discourses about the use and utility of risk communication in advanced liberal societies.
机译：本文旨在突显一些潜在的基本原理，这些基本原理可为学术界和政策界提供有关风险沟通构成的一般概念。首先概述了在风险交流中通常采用的“规范性”，“工具性”和“实质性”命令。鉴于这些考虑，随后设计了一种理论方案，导致阐明了四种基本的“理想化”风险沟通模型，分别称为“风险信息”模型，“风险对话”模型，“风险领域”模型和“风险领域”模型。分别是“风险政府”模式。有人认为，每个模型的方向所基于的各种概念基础表明，还需要对风险沟通进行更具体的了解，不仅要考虑风险沟通的不同表述和功能的优势和局限性，还要考虑到潜在的知识/动力构成其基础。尤其是，希望这里介绍的反思性理论理解将有助于为高级自由社会中风险交流的使用和效用的学术和政策论述带来一些急需的概念上的清晰性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号