首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >Examining Science to Develop Policy
【24h】

Examining Science to Develop Policy

机译:审查科学以制定政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the Letter to the, Editor Drs. Henshaw and Carroll suggest that our focus on childhood leukemia (Kheifets et al., 2005, 2006) as a basis for precautionary policies is: (1) unjustified given that several more common diseases have also been linked to exposure to power-frequency magnetic fields (MF); and (2) because of this, the scope of precaution-based policies that attempt to limit exposures to MF should be increased. The evidence and their analysis, however, do not support their argument.
机译:在给博士的信中,编辑Dr. Henshaw和Carroll建议我们将儿童白血病作为预防政策的基础(Kheifets et al。,2005,2006):(1)没有道理,因为还有几种常见疾病也与暴露于工频磁场有关。 (MF); (2)因此,应扩大基于预防措施的政策的范围,这些政策试图限制MF的暴露。但是,证据及其分析并不支持其论点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号