• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >Comments on 'CAPPS II: The Foundation of Aviation Security?'
【24h】

Comments on 'CAPPS II: The Foundation of Aviation Security?'

机译：关于“ CAPPS II：航空安全的基础？”的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

One conclusion of the subject article is that "CAPPS II could well do more good than harm if it is viewed as one weapon in the anti-terrorist arsenal rather than as the preeminent weapon." Indeed, I feel even more strongly than the author that CAPPS II should not be the "foundation of aviation security," although there may be benefits from the system as one of many weapons in the anti-terrorist arsenal. Rather, the approach that is likely to be successful emphasizes real-time screening, not the static classification of passengers, and will involve a variety of tools and processes to not only screen passengers, but to examine other avenues for attacking aircraft. The tools and processes most likely to be successful are (1) an overarching risk assessment of terrorism threats to airplane security to properly scope the issue, (2) strategic screening of passengers and cargo, and (3) the examination of other pathways for compromising aircraft security such as crews, ground services (food, fuel, maintenance, parking, etc.), and attacks from external sources, for example, missiles.
机译：该主题文章的一个结论是：“如果将CAPPS II视为反恐武库中的一种武器而不是杰出的武器，它的好处多于伤害。”确实，我比作者更加强烈地认为，CAPPS II不应成为“航空安全的基础”，尽管该系统作为反恐武器库中的许多武器之一可能会受益。相反，可能成功的方法强调实时筛选，而不是对旅客的静态分类，并且将涉及各种工具和过程，不仅筛选旅客，而且检查攻击飞机的其他途径。最有可能成功的工具和流程是：（1）对飞机安全造成的恐怖主义威胁进行全面风险评估，以适当地确定问题的范围；（2）对旅客和货物进行战略检查；（3）检查其他折衷途径飞机安全，例如机组人员，地面服务（食物，燃料，维护，停车等），以及来自外部来源的攻击，例如导弹。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号