• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >Toward a Commonly Shared Public Policy Perspective for Analyzing Risk Coping Strategies
【24h】

Toward a Commonly Shared Public Policy Perspective for Analyzing Risk Coping Strategies

机译：走向普通共同的公共政策视角，分析风险应对策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The concept of risk has received scholarly attention from a variety of angles in the social, technical, and natural sciences. However, public policy scholars have not yet generated a comprehensive overview, shared understanding and conceptual framework of the main problem-solving approaches applied by governments in coping with risks. In this regard, our main aim is to examine existing perspectives on prevailing risk coping strategies, find a common denominator among them and contribute to current policy and risk science literature through providing a conceptual framework that systematically spans the spectrum of risk coping strategies and incorporates the essence of the most relevant insights. To this end, we first examine the concept of risk in-depth by exploring various definitions and types of risk. We then review different approaches proposed by different strands of research for addressing risk. Finally, we assess current knowledge and develop an amalgamated perspective for examining how risks can be addressed by classifying them into six general types of response (no response; prevention; control; precaution; toleration; and adaptation) as well as indicators to identify these responses. We argue that these strategies can function as a heuristic tool for decisionmakers in designing appropriate policies to cope with risks in decision-making processes.
机译：风险的概念从社会，技术和自然科学的各种角度接受了学术关注。但是，公共政策学者尚未产生全面的概述，各国政府在应对风险方面采用的主要问题解决方法的共同理解和概念框架。在这方面，我们的主要目的是审查对普遍风险应对策略的现有观点，在他们中找到一个共同的分母，并通过提供一个概念框架，为目前的政策和风险科学文献提供了一种系统地跨越风险应对策略的频谱并融入其中最相关见解的本质。为此，我们首先通过探索各种定义和风险类型来深入研究风险的概念。然后，我们审查了不同股线的不同方法，以解决风险。最后，我们评估当前知识并开发一个合并的视角，了解如何通过将它们分类为六种一般类型的响应来解决风险如何（无响应;控制;预防;容忍;和适应）以及指标识别这些反应的指标。我们认为，这些战略可以作为决策者设计适当政策的启发式工具，以应对决策过程中的风险。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Risk analysis》 |2021年第3期|519-532|共14页
  • 作者

    Li Yanwei; Taeihagh Araz; de Jong Martin; Klinke Andreas;

  • 作者单位

    Nanjing Normal Univ Dept Publ Adm Nanjing Jiangsu Peoples R China|Nanjing Normal Univ Sch Publ Management Dept Publ Adm 1 Wenyuan Rd Nanjing 210023 Jiangsu Peoples R China;

    Natl Univ Singapore Lee Kuan Yew Sch Publ Policy Singapore Singapore;

    Erasmus Univ Rotterdam Sch Management Rotterdam Netherlands|Erasmus Univ Erasmus Sch Law Rotterdam Netherlands|Fudan Univ Inst Global Publ Policy Shanghai Peoples R China;

    Mem Univ New Foundland Environm Policy Inst Corner Brook NF Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Complexity; framework; public policy; review; risk; strategies;

    机译：复杂性;框架;公共政策;审查;风险;策略;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号