• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >Indigenous Knowledge in a Postgenomic Landscape: The Politics of Epigenetic Hope and Reparation in Australia
【24h】

Indigenous Knowledge in a Postgenomic Landscape: The Politics of Epigenetic Hope and Reparation in Australia

机译：后基因组景观中的土著知识：澳大利亚的表观遗传希望与赔偿政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A history of colonization inflicts psychological, physical, and structural disadvantages that endure across generations. For an increasing number of Indigenous Australians, environmental epigenetics offers an important explanatory framework that links the social past with the biological present, providing a culturally relevant way of understanding the various intergenerational effects of historical trauma. In this paper, we critically examine the strategic uptake of environmental epigenetics by Indigenous researchers and policy advocates. We focus on the relationship between epigenetic processes and Indigenous views of Country and health-views that locate health not in individual bodies but within relational contexts of Indigenous ontologies that embody interconnected environments of kin/animals/matter/bodies across time and space. This drawing together of Indigenous experience and epigenetic knowledge has strengthened calls for action including state-supported calls for financial reparations. We examine the consequences of this reimagining of disease responsibility in the context of "strategic biological essentialism," a distinct form of biopolitics that, in this case, incorporates environmental determinism. We conclude that the shaping of the right to protection from biosocial injury is potentially empowering but also has the capacity to conceal forms of governance through claimants' identification as "damaged," thus furthering State justification of biopolitical intervention in Indigenous lives.
机译：殖民历史造成了代代相传的心理，身体和结构上的不利条件。对于越来越多的澳大利亚土著人来说，环境表观遗传学提供了一个重要的解释框架，该框架将社会过去与生物学现状联系在一起，提供了一种文化上相关的方式来理解历史创伤的各种代际影响。在本文中，我们严格审查了土著研究人员和政策倡导者对环境表观遗传学的战略吸收。我们关注表观遗传过程与国家的原住民观点之间的关系，以及将健康定位在个体体内而不是在个体本体的关系上下文中的健康观点，这些本体体现了跨越时空的亲属/动物/物质/身体的相互联系的环境。土著经验和表观遗传学知识的结合，加强了行动呼吁，包括国家支持的经济赔偿要求。在“战略生物学本质主义”的背景下，我们研究了这种疾病责任重塑的后果，这是一种独特的生物政治形式，在这种情况下，它包含了环境决定论。我们得出的结论是，保护免受生物社会伤害的权利的形成可能会赋权，但也有能力通过索赔人将其识别为“受损害的”来掩盖治理形式，从而进一步促进了国家对土著人民进行生物政治干预的理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号