...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >The Geopolitics of Climate Knowledge Mobilization: Transdisciplinary Research at the Science-Policy Interface(s) in the Americas
【24h】

The Geopolitics of Climate Knowledge Mobilization: Transdisciplinary Research at the Science-Policy Interface(s) in the Americas

机译：气候知识动员的地缘政治学：美洲科学与政策互动的跨学科研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Climate change and sustainability science have become more international in scope and transdisciplinary in nature, in response to growing expectations that scientific knowledge directly informs collective action and transformation. In this article, we move past idealized models of the science–policy interface to examine the social processes and geopolitical dynamics of knowledge mobilization. We argue that sociotechnical imaginaries of transdisciplinary research, deployed in parallel to “universal” regimes of evidence-based decision-making from the global North, conceal how international collaborations of scientists and societal actors actually experience knowledge mobilization, its systemic barriers, and its paths to policy action. Through ethnographic study of a transdisciplinary research program in the Americas, coupled with in-depth analysis of Colombia, we reveal divergences in how participants envision and experience knowledge mobilization and identify persistent disparities that diminish the capacity of researchers to influence decision-making and fit climate knowledge within broader neoliberal development paradigms. Results of the study point to a plurality of science–policy interface(s), each shaped by national sociotechnical imaginaries, development priorities, and local social orders. We conclude that a geopolitical approach to transdisciplinary science is necessary to understand how climate and sustainability knowledge circulates unevenly in a world marked by persistent inequality and dominance.
机译：气候变化和可持续性科学在范围和跨学科方面已变得更加国际化，这是对人们日益增长的对科学知识直接为集体行动和变革提供信息的期望的回应。在本文中，我们将超越科学与政策互动的理想模型，以研究知识动员的社会过程和地缘政治动态。我们认为，跨学科研究的社会技术假想与来自全球北方的循证决策的“普遍”决策制度并行部署，掩盖了科学家和社会行为者的国际合作实际上如何体验知识动员，其系统性障碍及其路径采取政策行动。通过对美洲跨学科研究计划的人种学研究，再加上对哥伦比亚的深入分析，我们揭示了参与者在设想和体验知识动员方面的分歧，并确定了持续存在的差距，这些差距削弱了研究人员影响决策和适应气候的能力新自由主义发展范式中的知识。研究结果表明，科学与政策之间存在着多种联系，每种相互作用都由国家的社会技术想象力，发展重点和地方社会秩序所决定。我们得出结论，跨学科科学的地缘政治方法对于了解气候和可持续性知识如何在一个持续存在的不平等和主导地位的世界中不平衡地传播是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号