• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >The Troubling Logic of Inclusivity in Environmental Consultations
【24h】

The Troubling Logic of Inclusivity in Environmental Consultations

机译：环境咨询中包容性的令人不安的逻辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Inclusivity is widely considered a requirement of defensible environmental risk consultations and is often either mandated or recommended to help ensure attention to stakeholders' diverse views. Experience suggests the opposite: the emphasis on an inclusive consultation process often makes it impossible for decision makers to listen carefully to stakeholders and for citizens' views to influence the design and choice of proposed actions. This paper briefly reviews the promise of environmental risk consultations before outlining several of the more serious problems associated with an emphasis on inclusivity: long lists of undifferentiated concerns, facts tainted by stakeholders' perspectives and worldviews, little access to clarifying dialogue or tests of expertise, few opportunities to scrutinize knowledge quality, avoidance of controversial issues, and an overwhelming abundance of information. As a result, the promotion of inclusivity often serves as a convenient excuse for decision makers to silence citizens by substituting quantity for quality, breadth for depth, and an adversarial approach for dialogue and informed understanding.
机译：包容性被广泛认为是可辩护的环境风险协商的要求，并且通常被要求或建议包容性以帮助确保关注利益相关者的不同观点。经验表明恰恰相反：强调包容性协商过程通常会使决策者无法认真听取利益相关者的意见，也无法使公民的意见影响拟议行动的设计和选择。在概述与包容性相关的一些更严重的问题之前，本文简要回顾了环境风险咨询的前景：未分类的关注点一长串，利益相关者的观点和世界观所污染的事实，澄清对话或专业知识的途径很少，几乎没有机会审查知识质量，避免有争议的问题以及大量的信息。结果，包容性的提高通常是决策者通过以数量代替质量，以广度代替深度，以对抗性方式进行对话和知情理解而使公民沉默的便利借口。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号