• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >Why Map Issues? On Controversy Analysis as a Digital Method
【24h】

Why Map Issues? On Controversy Analysis as a Digital Method

机译：为什么要发行地图？数字化争议分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article takes stock of recent efforts to implement controversy analysis as a digital method in the study of science, technology, and society (STS) and beyond and outlines a distinctive approach to address the problem of digital bias. Digital media technologies exert significant influence on the enactment of controversy in online settings, and this risks undermining the substantive focus of controversy analysis conducted by digital means. To address this problem, I propose a shift in thematic focus from controversy analysis to issue mapping. The article begins by distinguishing between three broad frameworks that currently guide the development of controversy analysis as a digital method, namely, demarcationist, discursive, and empiricist. Each has been adopted in STS, but only the last one offers a digital "move beyond impartiality." I demonstrate this approach by analyzing issues of Internet governance with the aid of the social media platform Twitter.
机译：本文总结了最近在将争议分析作为一种数字方法进行科学，技术和社会（STS）研究之外的工作，并概述了解决数字偏差问题的独特方法。数字媒体技术对在线环境中争议的制定产生了重大影响，这有可能破坏通过数字方式进行争议分析的实质性焦点。为了解决这个问题，我建议将主题重点从争议分析转移到问题映射。本文首先区分当前指导争议分析作为数字方法发展的三个广泛框架，即分界论，话语论和经验论。每一种都已在STS中采用，但只有最后一种提供了数字“超越公正性”。我通过借助社交媒体平台Twitter分析Internet治理问题来演示这种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号