首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >Drama, Talk, and Emotion: Omitted Aspects of Public Participation
【24h】

Drama, Talk, and Emotion: Omitted Aspects of Public Participation

机译:戏剧,谈话和情感:公众参与的遗漏之处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article argues that the quantitative and quasi-experimental approach to evaluating public participation exercises is deficient in at least two respects. First, casting participants in instrumental terms excludes that participants have an experience and that this may be dramatic and emotional. If people are to be invited, even obliged, to participate, then this experience should be considered in event evaluation. Second, current evaluation frameworks tend not to be sensitive to what actually happened in terms of the actions of participants and how these influenced the proceedings and outcome, thus ignoring that such events are for a where positions, values, decisions, and so forth are constructed and constrained rather than simply reported. This article considers the possible contribution of dramaturgical, discourse and conversation analytic, and ethnographic and phenomenological approaches to evaluating participation exercises and illustrates their potential with data gathered during the U.K. "GM Nation?" public debate.
机译:本文认为,评估公众参与活动的定量和半实验方法在至少两个方面是不足的。首先,以工具性用语表述参与者不包括参与者具有经验,并且这可能是戏剧性和情感性的。如果要邀请人们甚至有义务参加,那么在活动评估中应考虑这种经验。其次,当前的评估框架往往对参与者的行为以及所发生的行为如何影响程序和结果并不敏感,因此忽略了此类事件是针对构建立场,价值,决策等的地方。并受到约束,而不是简单地报道。本文考虑了戏剧学,话语和对话分析以及人种学和现象学方法对参与活动评估的可能贡献,并通过在英国“ GM Nation?”期间收集的数据来说明其潜力。公开辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号