• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >Lost in the mall with Mesmer and Wundt: Demarcations and demonstrations in the psychologies
【24h】

Lost in the mall with Mesmer and Wundt: Demarcations and demonstrations in the psychologies

机译：与Mesmer和Wundt迷失在购物中心：心理学的界线和示威

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article analyzes the demarcations made within psychology as a feature of the "memory wars"-the current controversy around "recovered" or "false" memory. As it is played out inside professional psychology, the dispute features clinical practitioners acting largely as proponents of recovered memory and experimentalists as proponents of false memory. Tracing a genealogy of this dispute back to a pair of original sites (Mesmer's salon and Wundts laboratory), we show how the traditions' engagement in three modes of scientific demonstration varies systematically in terms of the modes of social relation inherent in their epistemic practices and the kinds of "reliable witness" these practices produce. We conclude that whereas the experimentalist tradition is able to transport their produced witnesses from one to another site of demonstration with relative ease, the clinical tradition has much greater difficulty in doing so and thus has to engage in a variety of compensatory demonstrative strategies.
机译：本文分析了心理学中作为“记忆大战”的一个特征而进行的划分-当前有关“恢复”或“虚假”记忆的争论。由于它是在专业心理学中进行的，因此争议的特征是临床医生主要充当恢复记忆的支持者，而实验学家则充当错误记忆的支持者。将这一争端的家谱追溯到两个原始地点（梅斯梅尔沙龙和旺兹实验室），我们展示了传统在三种科学证明方式中的参与方式如何根据其认知实践中固有的社会关系方式而系统地变化。这些做法产生了什么样的“可靠见证”。我们得出的结论是，尽管实验主义者的传统能够相对容易地将他们的证人从一个证人那里转移到另一个论证地点，但临床传统却很难做到这一点，因此必须采取各种补偿性示范策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号