• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Best soil comanagement practices for two watersheds in Germany and Iran using game theory-based approaches
【24h】

Best soil comanagement practices for two watersheds in Germany and Iran using game theory-based approaches

机译：使用基于博弈论的方法对德国和伊朗两个流域的最佳土壤协同管理实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Collaborative management is increasingly applied to indicate environmental and socio-economic negotiations in every corner of the world. The engagement of multiple stakeholders accompanying experience, science, and economy probing skills is expected to unravel such issues. However, the collaborative approaches to manage existing issues at watershed scale have not been adequately applied. Therefore, the present study has exemplified the establishment of a comanagement framework for the soil management for two case studies i.e., Schleswig-Holstein State of Germany and Galazchai Watershed of Iran using a stakeholder oriented approach applying game theory based methods. Due to management perspectives, different stakeholder groups were involved to investigate effective soil conservation practices. Farmers, consultants, and service providing companies in Germany and residents, policy making institutions and executive organizations in Iran were detected as key stakeholders. The Condorcet and Fallback bargaining methods were used to diagnosis agreement point. Based upon the results, the developed case study in Germany demonstrated close relation among farmers and consultants (53%) in contrast with service providing companies. The same situation was observed among residents and policy makers in Iran. Besides, the tendency to implement mechanical practices among farmers in Iran was about 60% (149 of 243), however, in Germany 86% of farmers prefer to use managerial practices. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译：协作管理越来越多地用于指示世界各个角落的环境和社会经济谈判。期望有经验，科学和经济探测技能的多个利益相关者参与，才能解决此类问题。但是，在流域范围内管理现有问题的协作方法尚未得到充分应用。因此，本研究已举例说明了土壤管理的共同管理框架，该研究使用了基于利益相关者的博弈论方法，为两个案例研究即德国石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州和伊朗加拉兹柴分水岭建立了土壤管理的共同管理框架。由于管理的观点，不同的利益相关者团体参与了调查有效的土壤保护实践的活动。检测到德国的农民，顾问和服务提供公司以及伊朗的居民，决策机构和执行组织是主要的利益相关者。使用Condorcet和Fallback讨价还价方法来诊断一致点。根据结果​​，德国的案例研究表明，与服务提供公司相比，农民和顾问之间的亲密关系（53％）。在伊朗的居民和决策者中也观察到了同样的情况。此外，在伊朗的农民中实行机械做法的趋势约为60％（243人中的149人），但是在德国，有86％的农民更喜欢采用管理做法。 （C）2019 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号