• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Scientific studies of reading >Lexical Reading in Dysfluent Readers of German
【24h】

Lexical Reading in Dysfluent Readers of German

机译：德语的流浪汉中的词汇阅读

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Dyslexia in consistent orthographies like German is characterized by dysfluent reading, which is often assumed to result from failure to build up an orthographic lexicon and overreliance on decoding. However, earlier evidence indicates effects of lexical processing at least in some German dyslexic readers. We investigated variations in reading style in an eye-tracking paradigm with German dysfluent 3rd and 4th graders. Twenty-six TypFix-readers (fixation counts within the range of 47 age-matched typical readers) were compared with 42 HighFix-readers (increased fixation counts). Both groups showed lexical access: Words were read more efficiently than nonwords and pseudohomophones. TypFix-readers showed stronger reliance on lexical reading than HighFix-readers (smaller length effects for number of fixations and total reading time, stronger lexicality effects for gaze duration, stronger word-pseudohomophone effects for mean saccade amplitude). We conclude that in both groups, sublexical and lexical reading processes were impaired due to inefficient visual-verbal integration.
机译：一致的拼字法（如德语）中的诵读困难的特征是读错，通常被认为是由于拼字词典无法建立以及对解码的过度依赖导致的。但是，较早的证据表明，至少在某些德国阅读困难的读者中，词汇加工的影响。我们以眼力不佳的德国三年级和四年级生的眼动追踪范式调查了阅读风格的差异。将26台TypFix阅读器（固定计数在47个年龄匹配的典型阅读器范围内）与42台HighFix阅读器（固定计数增加）进行了比较。两组都显示了词汇访问：单词的阅读效率比非单词和伪谐音高。与HighFix阅读器相比，TypFix阅读器显示出对词汇阅读的依赖性更高（注视次数和总阅读时间的长度效应更小，注视持续时间的词法效应更强，平均扫视幅度的单词-伪谐音效应更强）。我们得出的结论是，由于视觉-言语整合效率低下，在两组中，次词汇和词汇阅读过程均受到损害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号