...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Security studies >The Bush Doctrine and the Iraq War: Neoconservatives Versus Realists
【24h】

The Bush Doctrine and the Iraq War: Neoconservatives Versus Realists

机译：布什主义与伊拉克战争：新保守主义者与现实主义者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The aim of this article is to contribute to our understanding of both the debate over the war in Iraq and its implications for the future of U.S. foreign policy by examining the relationship between neocon-servatism and realism. The article begins by establishing the connection between the tenets of neoconservatism and the arguments for war against Iraq. The primary focus is on the neoconservative Bush Doctrine that served as the primary justification for the Iraq War. Next, we turn to the arguments that realists put forth in their attempt to steer America away from the road to war. The realists, however, proved to be unsuccessful in their attempt to prevent war and in the final section we address the central question of the article; why did realism fail in the debate over Iraq?
机译：本文的目的是通过研究新保守主义与现实主义之间的关系，帮助我们理解关于伊拉克战争的辩论及其对美国外交政策未来的影响。本文首先建立了新保守主义的宗旨与对伊拉克战争的论点之间的联系。主要重点是新保守主义的布什主义，它是伊拉克战争的主要理由。接下来，我们转向现实主义者为使美国远离战争之路而提出的论点。但是，现实主义者在阻止战争的努力中被证明是失败的，在最后一节中，我们讨论了本文的核心问题。为什么现实主义在关于伊拉克的辩论中失败了？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号