• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Social influence >Saving water to save the environment: contrasting the effectiveness of environmental and monetary appeals in a residential water saving intervention
【24h】

Saving water to save the environment: contrasting the effectiveness of environmental and monetary appeals in a residential water saving intervention

机译：节约用水以保护环境：在住宅节水干预中对比环境和金钱诉求的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

To convince people to reduce their energy consumption, two types of persuasive appeals often are used by environmental organizations: Monetary appeals (i.e., conserving energy will save you money') and environmental appeals (i.e., conserving energy will protect the environment'). In this field study we aimed to compare the effects of monetary and environmental appeals on showering habits. During two weeks we measured showering behavior in one hundred households. As compared to monetary appeals, environmental appeals were more effective in decreasing participants' shower frequency. Interestingly, the monetary appeal was judged as somewhat more motivating to save water than the environmental appeal. We discuss theoretical and practical implications of these findings.
机译：为了说服人们减少能源消耗，环境组织经常使用两种类型的说服力呼吁：金钱呼吁（即节约能源将为您节省金钱）和环境呼吁（即节约能源将保护环境）。在这项现场研究中，我们旨在比较金钱和环境吸引力对淋浴习惯的影响。在两个星期内，我们测量了一百个家庭的淋浴行为。与金钱诉求相比，环境诉求在降低参与者的洗礼频率上更为有效。有趣的是，人们认为，与环境呼吁相比，货币呼吁更具节水动机。我们讨论了这些发现的理论和实践意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号