• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Social Justice Research >Does Moral Conviction Really Override Concerns About Procedural Justice? A Reexamination of the Value Protection Model
【24h】

Does Moral Conviction Really Override Concerns About Procedural Justice? A Reexamination of the Value Protection Model

机译：道德信念真的超越了对程序正义的关注吗？价值保护模型的重新审视

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A large research literature on procedural justice demonstrates that people are more accepting of decisions that they do not feel are advantageous or fair when those decisions are arrived at using just procedures. Recently, several papers (Skitka, Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 28:588–597, 2002; Skitka and Mullen, Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 28:1419–1429, 2002) have argued that these procedural mechanisms do not have a significant influence when the decision made concerns issues about which those involved have strong moral feelings (“a moral mandate”). A reanalysis of the data in these two studies indicates that, contrary to the strong position taken by the authors, i.e. that “when people have a moral mandate about an outcome, any means justifies the mandated end” (Skitka, Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 28:594, 2002), the justice of decision-making procedures is consistently found to significantly influence people’s reactions to decisions by authorities and institutions even when their moral mandates are threatened.
机译：关于程序正义的大量研究文献表明，当人们仅使用程序做出决策时，人们会更加接受那些自己认为不是有利或不公平的决策。最近，几篇论文（Skitka，Pers Soc Psychol Bull，28：588-597，2002； Skitka和Mullen，Pers Soc Psychol Bull，28：1419-1429，2002）认为，当以下情况时，这些程序机制没有显着影响该决定涉及涉及的人具有强烈的道德感（“道德要求”）的问题。对这两项研究中的数据进行的重新分析表明，与作者所持的坚定立场相反，即“当人们对结果有道德要求时，任何手段都可以证明要求的结果是合理的”（Skitka，Pers Soc Psychol Bull， 28：594，2002），人们始终认为决策程序的公正性会严重影响人们对当局和机构对决策的反应，即使他们的道德使命受到威胁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号