...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Social Work Education: The International Journal >Anti-Oppressive Practice and Social Work Students' Portfolios in Scotland
【24h】

Anti-Oppressive Practice and Social Work Students' Portfolios in Scotland

机译：苏格兰的反压抑实践和社会工作学生的作品集

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Anti-oppressive practice is seen by social work educators as a key approach to social work in the UK. However, controversies exist about its use in practice. Recent literature has criticised the complexities and problematics of anti-oppressive practice. An examination is made of the content of portfolios completed by social work students undertaking a final practice learning opportunity on a post-graduate programme in Scotland. The findings indicate that students gave considerable attention to power, empowerment and partnership but there was also an apparent general acceptance of agency policies, procedures and wider structural oppression. Also some aspects of social divisions and forms of oppression such as gender, age, disability and language received considerable attention while others such as ‘race’, class, sexuality and religion received less attention. Limitations of the research are noted. Suggestions for improvement in considering anti-oppressive material include a focus on both micro and macro issues, ranging from the structure for the portfolio and the content of supervision discussions through to agency policies and procedures and the national guidelines provided to social work programmes.View full textDownload full textKeywordsAssessment, Anti-Discriminatory Practice, Higher Education, Practice Learning, StudentsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02615471003605082
机译：社会工作教育者认为反压迫行为是英国社会工作的一种重要方法。但是，在实践中存在争议。最近的文献批评了反压迫行动的复杂性和问题。对社会工作学生完成的档案袋的内容进行考试，他们在苏格兰的研究生课程中获得了最后的实践学习机会。调查结果表明，学生对权力，授权和伙伴关系给予了极大的关注，但显然也普遍接受了代理机构的政策，程序和更广泛的结构性压迫。社会分化和压迫形式的某些方面，例如性别，年龄，残疾和语言，也受到相当多的关注，而“种族”，阶级，性别和宗教等其他方面则受到较少的关注。指出了研究的局限性。关于改进抗压迫性材料的建议包括从微观和宏观两个方面着眼，从投资组合的结构和监督讨论的内容一直到机构政策和程序以及为社会工作计划提供的国家准则。关键字：评估，反歧视实践，高等教育，实践学习，学生google，more“，发布号：” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02615471003605082

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号