首页> 外文期刊>Sociological Spectrum >THE FATALISTIC IMAGINATION AND THE CONTINUED SALIENCE OF RELIGION IN THE MODERN WORLD: A TEST OF RESOURCE COMPENSATION/RESOURCE AMPLIFICATION HYPOTHESES USING CROSSNATIONAL DATA
【24h】

THE FATALISTIC IMAGINATION AND THE CONTINUED SALIENCE OF RELIGION IN THE MODERN WORLD: A TEST OF RESOURCE COMPENSATION/RESOURCE AMPLIFICATION HYPOTHESES USING CROSSNATIONAL DATA

机译:现代世界中的幻想想象和宗教的持续凸显:使用跨国数据进行的资源补偿/资源放大假设的检验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The resource compensation hypothesis predicts that religiosity will serve as a cognitive buffer against structural constraints whereby more religious individuals will exhibit lower levels of fatalism than their less religious counterparts. The resource amplification perspective, on the other hand, predicts that religiosity will foster a sense that otherworldly forces control life's outcomes, leading to higher levels of fatalism. Using a precise measure of fatalism from the two most recent waves of the World Values Survey, a comparative examination of three Latin American countries, South Africa, and the United States is carried out. With Mexico as the sole exception, findings from ordered logistic regression models suggest that higher levels of religiosity are associated with lower levels of fatalism, supporting the resource compensation hypothesis. Implications for longstanding debates over the salience of modern religion are considered. An important and underappreciated cognitive function provided by thriving religious denominations and institutions may be to provide a catalyst for personal empowerment that comes through the rejection of a fatalistic mentality.
机译:资源补偿假说预测,宗教信仰将作为对结构性约束的认知缓冲,从而使更多宗教信仰的人比不那么宗教信仰的人表现出更低的宿命论。另一方面,从资源放大的角度来看,宗教信仰将使人感觉到超脱的力量控制着生活的结果,导致宿命论的水平提高。使用最近两次世界价值调查中的宿命论的精确测量,对三个拉丁美洲国家,南非和美国进行了比较研究。墨西哥是唯一的例外,有序逻辑回归模型的发现表明,较高的宗教信仰与较低的宿命论相关,从而支持了资源补偿假说。考虑了关于现代宗教的显着性的长期辩论的含义。蓬勃发展的宗教派别和机构所提供的重要而未被充分认识的认知功能可能是通过拒绝宿命论心态来促进个人能力的催化剂。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Sociological Spectrum》 |2008年第5期|602-624|共23页
  • 作者

    Gabriel A. Acevedo;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Sociology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号