• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sophia >Sense in Competing Narratives of Secularization: Charles Taylor and Jean-Luc Nancy
【24h】

Sense in Competing Narratives of Secularization: Charles Taylor and Jean-Luc Nancy

机译：世俗化叙事的意识：查尔斯·泰勒和让·卢克·南希

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this article, using the recent work by Charles Taylor in A Secular Age as my point of departure, I will argue that Jean-Luc Nancy enables us to think past the competing binary of atheistic and religious experience and allows us to surpass the present narratives of secularism. In A Secular Age, Taylor himself seeks a middle ground between atheism and religion, arguing that it is possible to open ourselves to the cross-pressures of modern existence that find us caught between scientific atheism and a need for spiritual and religious guidance. Here, Taylor finds a way of picturing ourselves within a secular age, remaining faithful to scientific rationalism, but still open to religion and a sense of a higher good. However, as I shall demonstrate, in his thesis Taylor misrepresents the Continental philosophical tradition (particularly Nietzsche and post-structuralism) that has itself sought to understand these cross-pressures of existence. Taking this misrepresentation, and specifically his reductive and colloquial analysis of Nietzsche, Camus, and Derrida, as my point of departure, I provide an alternative manner of thinking through the work of these writers, one that leads to a detailed analysis of Jean-Luc Nancy and his project the deconstruction of Christianity. In this analysis I argue that Nancy provides a manner of thinking that remains open and allows an experience of freedom, without seeking to close that sense of openness with explanation, nor maintaining that sense of openness with a conception of the divine.
机译：在本文中，我将以查尔斯·泰勒（Charles Taylor）在《世俗时代》中的最新作品为出发点，我认为让·卢克·南希（Jean-Luc Nancy）使我们能够超越无神论和宗教经验的对立二元思维，并使我们超越目前的叙述世俗主义。在世俗时代，泰勒本人寻求在无神论与宗教之间寻求一个中间立场，认为有可能使自己面对现代存在的交叉压力，这使我们陷入科学无神论与精神和宗教指导的需求之间。在这里，泰勒找到了一种在世俗时代描绘自己的方式，仍然忠于科学理性主义，但仍然对宗教开放并拥有更高的品位。但是，正如我将要证明的那样，泰勒在其论文中歪曲了大陆哲学传统（尤其是尼采和后结构主义），而后者本身一直试图理解这些存在的交叉压力。以这种错误的陈述，特别是他对尼采，加缪和德里达的还原性和口语化分析为出发点，我通过这些作家的工作提供了另一种思考方式，这种方式导致对让·吕克的详细分析。南希和他的项目是对基督教的解构。在这一分析中，我认为南希提供了一种开放的思维方式，允许人们体验自由，而没有试图用解释来封闭那种开放感，也没有用神圣的观念来保持那种开放感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号