• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sophia >‘In the Court of a Great King’: Some Remarks on Leo Strauss’ Introduction to the Guide for the Perplexed
【24h】

‘In the Court of a Great King’: Some Remarks on Leo Strauss’ Introduction to the Guide for the Perplexed

机译：“在大帝的宫廷中”：关于利奥·施特劳斯的一些评论”《困惑者指南》简介

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This essay, which will be divided between two SOPHIA editions, proposes to test the consensus in Maimonidean scholarship on the alleged intellectualism of Leo Strauss’ Maimonides by making a close interpretive study of Strauss’ 1963 essay ‘How to Begin to Study the Guide for the Perplexed’. While the importance of this essay, which is Strauss’ last extended piece on the Guide, is established in Maimonidean scholarship, its recognised esotericism has been matched by a dearth of detailed studies of the piece. We aim in this essay to try to rectify this situation, by reading ‘How to Begin to Study’ as Strauss directs us to read esoteric texts in Persecution and the Art of Writing. As one control on our exegetical claims, we will close by situating our reading of ‘How to Begin to Study’ and Strauss’ positions there on philosophy, prophecy and the Torah alongside the claims of his earlier, much less esoteric, but also rarely studied: ‘Some Remarks on the Political Science of Maimonides and Farabi’. Because of the now widely recognised foundational importance of Maimonides in understanding Leo Strauss’ own lasting positions, this work will have wider importance in Strauss scholarship, and hopefully make a contribution to the continuing task of trying to understand Strauss’ important thoughts on Athens and Jerusalem, reason and revelation, the city and man.
机译：这篇文章将分为两个SOPHIA版本，建议通过对Strauss于1963年发表的论文“ How to Begins to Study the Guide for the Study”进行仔细的解释性研究，以检验Maimonidean奖学金对Leo Strauss的Maimonides所谓的知识论的共识。困惑'。这篇文章的重要性是施特劳斯在《指南》上的最后扩展，是在迈蒙尼德奖学金中确定的，但其公认的深奥主义与对该文章的详细研究不相称。在这篇文章中，我们的目的是试图纠正这种情况，因为施特劳斯指导我们阅读《迫害和写作艺术》中的奥义文字，因此请阅读“如何开始学习”。作为对释义主张的一种控制，我们将以“如何开始学习”和施特劳斯在哲学，预言和《摩西五经》上的立场以及他较早的，较深奥的但很少研究的主张为结尾：“关于迈蒙尼德斯和法拉比政治学的一些评论”。由于迈蒙尼德斯在理解利奥·施特劳斯的持久立场方面具有广泛的基础性，这一工作在施特劳斯的学术研究中将具有更广泛的重要性，并希望为继续努力理解施特劳斯关于雅典和耶路撒冷的重要思想做出贡献，理性与启示，城市与人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号