• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sophia >Anxiety and the Face of the Other: Tillich and Levinas on the Origin of Questioning
【24h】

Anxiety and the Face of the Other: Tillich and Levinas on the Origin of Questioning

机译：焦虑与他人的面孔：蒂利希和列维纳斯关于质疑的起源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

With almost a century of historical distance between Heidegger’s retrieval of the question of being and contemporary concern about the Other, we have accrued invaluable experiences for critical leverage about what it is to ask one another questions. I offer a sketch aimed at adapting Tillich’s theological system grounded in existential questioning to today by juxtaposing him with Levinas’ philosophical ethics. Tillich and Levinas provide motive for reflection on the topic of questioning in particular. In the case of Tillich, questions constitute a crucial moment in the dialogue between our contemporary existential situation and religious symbols, or in what he called the ‘method of correlation.’ Furthermore, Tillich locates in the very structure of questioning the germ of our participation in our essential nature despite existential disruption. Beneath his more provocative and prophetic discourse on the absolute desolation and height of the Other, Levinas sees in questions a different kind of possibility. It is not our essential and existential selves, but oneself and the absolutely Other who come together in the question yet retain their infinite difference. Heidegger is the immediate predecessor from whom both Tillich and Levinas inherit a predilection for reflection on questioning. What is at stake is not merely the legacy of Heidegger’s construal of questioning, but, more importantly here, the fundamental sources Tillich and Levinas posit as the origin of our questioning.
机译：海德格尔对存在问题的追寻与当代对他人的关注之间有近一个世纪的历史距离，我们已经积累了宝贵的经验，这些经验对于提出另一个问题是至关重要的。我提供了一个草图，目的是通过将列维纳斯的哲学伦理并列于蒂利希的神学体系中，从而使他适应存在主义的今天。蒂利希和列维纳斯提供了反思问题的动机。以提利希为例，问题构成了我们当代生存状况与宗教符号之间对话的关键时刻，或者是他所谓的“相关方法”。此外，提利希还处于质疑我们参与的根源的结构之中。尽管存在破坏性的破坏，但我们的本质仍然如此。在关于他人的绝对荒凉和高度的更具挑衅性和预言性的论述之下，列维纳斯在质疑中看到了另一种可能性。不是我们的本质和存在自我，而是在问题上团结在一起的自己和绝对他人，却仍保持着无限的差异。海德格尔是蒂利希和列维纳斯继承的直接前身，对反思提出了反思。受到威胁的不仅是海德格尔质疑质询的遗产，而且在这里更重要的是，蒂利希和列维纳斯的基本渊源被认为是我们质疑的起源。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Sophia》 |2009年第3期|267-279|共13页
  • 作者

    Nathan Eric Dickman;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Philosophy and Religion, Coe College, Hickock Hall 306, Cedar Rapids, IA 52402, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Tillich; Levinas; Heidegger; Questioning; Dialogue;

    机译：提利希;列维纳斯;海德格尔;质疑;对话;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号