...
首页> 外文期刊>Space news >Space Resilience, Deterrence, Fast Ships and Harm's Way
【24h】

Space Resilience, Deterrence, Fast Ships and Harm's Way

机译:太空适应力,威慑力,快速飞船和危害之道

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 1778, Capt. John Paul Jones was in an anxious search for a frigate that would lead the fledgling U.S. navy in bringing the Revolutionary War back to British shores. In a letter to his French benefactors, he clearly set out his requirements for such a vessel: "I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast, for I intend to go in harm's way." In John Paul Jones' day, you survived at sea first by moving quickly to avoid being hit, and second by being able to rain fire upon the opposing vessel. Jones knew this, which is why he preferred a fast frigate with 30 to 40 guns over a "first rate ship of the line" with many more. In essence, Jones' requirements were a micro-encapsulation of deterrence theory: Deny benefit to the adversary (move fast to avoid being hit) and impose cost (hit him hard in return). It is a universal axiom as relevant to 21st century naval, land and air planners as it was to their 18th century counterparts.
机译:1778年,约翰·保罗·琼斯上尉急切地寻找一艘护卫舰,该护卫舰将带领刚起步的美国海军将“独立战争”带回英国。在给法国捐助者的一封信中,他明确规定了对这种船只的要求:“我希望与任何航行不快的船只都没有联系,因为我打算以伤害的方式行事。”在约翰·保罗·琼斯(John Paul Jones)时代,您首先在海中生存下来,方法是迅速移动以避免撞伤,其次是能够向对方船只开火。琼斯知道这一点,这就是为什么他更喜欢使用30至40支枪的快速护卫舰,而不是“护卫舰”中的更多护卫舰。本质上,琼斯的要求是对威慑理论的微观封装:拒绝给对手有利(迅速行动以避免受到打击)并施加成本(以打击他为重)。它是一种通用的公理,与18世纪的海军,陆地和空中计划者一样,它与21世纪的海军,陆军和空中计划者有关。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Space news》 |2014年第21期|1921|共3页
  • 作者

    DOUGLAS LOVERRO;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号