• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings >LATBSDC ALTERNATIVE DESIGN CASE STUDY—CONCRETE SHEAR WALL ONLY BEYOND 240-FOOT LABC CODE LIMIT: OPTIMIZED BEHAVIOR
【24h】

LATBSDC ALTERNATIVE DESIGN CASE STUDY—CONCRETE SHEAR WALL ONLY BEYOND 240-FOOT LABC CODE LIMIT: OPTIMIZED BEHAVIOR

机译：LATBSDC替代设计案例研究—混凝土剪力墙仅超出240英尺LABC代码限制：优化的行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The resurgence of high-rise construction has presented a challenge for the structural engineering community to bridge the gap between the requirements of prescriptive building code procedures and optimal structural system design. In response, the Los Angeles Tall Building Structural Design Council has formulated an alternate design procedure that provides a tool for the engineer to use to optimize the design the lateral force resisting system for high-rise buildings with the goal of achieving a design that would yield a performance at least equivalent to the prescriptive methods contained within the building code. Using the alternate procedures, a case study was performed for a sample high-rise building and compared to the same building design by prescriptive code procedures. The comparison was aimed at determining whether it could be concluded that an equivalent performance was obtained and what the required structural elements are for the two approaches. Lastly, a discussion of the benefits and drawbacks alternative design process itself is presented.
机译：高层建筑的兴起给结构工程界带来了挑战，要弥合规范性建筑规范程序要求与最佳结构系统设计之间的差距。作为回应，洛杉矶高层建筑结构设计委员会制定了另一种设计程序，为工程师提供了一种工具来优化设计高层建筑的横向抗力系统，以期实现可屈服的设计目标。性能至少等同于建筑规范中包含的规定方法。使用备用程序，对一个示例高层建筑进行了案例研究，并通过规范性代码程序将其与相同的建筑物设计进行了比较。比较的目的是确定是否可以得出结论，获得了同等的性能以及这两种方法所需的结构要素是什么。最后，讨论了替代设计过程本身的优缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号