• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in East European Thought >Was Brzozowski a “constructionist”? A contemporary reading of Brzozowski’s “philosophy of labour”
【24h】

Was Brzozowski a “constructionist”? A contemporary reading of Brzozowski’s “philosophy of labour”

机译：布拉佐夫斯基是“建构主义者”吗？布拉佐佐夫斯基“劳动哲学”的当代解读

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Brzozowski’s ‘philosophy of labour’—to which he devoted a number of writings starting in 1902—presents problems of interpretation. A conceptual approach to his conception shows it to be a sometimes uneasy mix of realist and anti-realist notions. Brzozowski appears to have thought that labour is not first of all about the things it supposedly transforms, but rather about itself. I suggest that Brzozowski can be read in the spirit of Nelson Goodman’s nominalist constructionalism (“worldmaking”). On this account, labour in Brzozowski’s idiom turns out to be the constitution of forms of symbolizing sufficient unto themselves and the needs they satisfy. However, that Brzozowski was not entirely consistent in the views I impute to him—he forever sought for some ‘external’ measure of the rightness of labour/symbolizing—can be explained at least in part by his ‘humanism’, that is, his commitment to the task he assigns humankind, that of creating the one meaningful world attesting to virtually unrestricted human power.
机译：布尔佐佐夫斯基（Brzozowski）的“劳动哲学”（他从1902年开始投入大量著作）提出了解释问题。对他的概念进行概念上的研究表明，它有时是现实主义和反现实主义概念的不安全混合。布尔佐佐夫斯基似乎认为，劳动首先不是它应该改变的东西，而是它自己。我建议可以按照纳尔逊·古德曼（Nelson Goodman）的唯名主义建构主义（“ worldmaking”）的精神来解读布尔佐佐夫斯基。因此，在布尔佐佐夫斯基的成语中，劳动是构成对自己和满足他们的需求的象征形式的构成。但是，在我所给予的观点上，布佐佐夫斯基并不完全一致（他一直在寻求劳工/象征性权利的某种“外部”衡量标准），至少可以用他的“人本主义”来解释，即对他分配给人类的任务的承诺，即创造一个有意义的世界，证明实际上不受限制的人类力量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号