首页> 外文期刊>Studies in history and philosophy of science >History of science and its Utopian reconstructions
【24h】

History of science and its Utopian reconstructions

机译:科学史及其乌托邦重建

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent years explicitly utopian visions have reappeared across the political spectrum. To a surprising degree these visions have drawn on histories and science and technology. What should scholars of Science and Technology Studies (STS) and History and Philosophy of Science (HPS) make of these developments? The concept of utopia has often been treated with considerable distrust in these fields, as an indication of closed end-directed blueprints, or as an indication of fantasies of limitless technological improvement and purification of categories. Alongside this uneasiness, however, HPS and STS scholars have also projected transformative ambitions, seeking to recover from the past different ways of knowing and relating to the human and non-human world. By engaging with critiques of utopia from thinkers including Karl Popper, Otto Neurath, Bruno Latour, Isabelle Stengers and Donna Haraway, and exploring some of the utopian strands which have recurred in studies of science and technology-including the longing for integration, the association of science with planning, and the ways in which feminist scholars have envisaged alternative forms of science-we can understand the ongoing, and often unrecognised, utopian dimensions of HPS and STS.
机译:近年来,明确的乌托邦视野已经重新出现在政治频统。令人惊讶的程度,这些愿景已经吸引了历史和科学和技术。什么应该学者科技研究(STS)和科学历史和哲学(HPS)制造这些发展?乌托邦的概念经常在这些领域中受到相当多的不信任,作为封闭的最终导向的蓝图的指示,或作为无限技术改善和纯化类别的幻想的指示。然而,随着这种不安的,HPS和Sts学者还投影了变革雄心壮志,寻求从过去的不同方式恢复和与人类和非人类世界有关的方式。通过与思想家的乌托邦批评,包括Karl Popper,Otto Neurath,Bruno Latour,Isabelle Stengers和Donna Haraway,以及探索在科学和技术研究中重复的一些乌托邦股 - 包括融合的融合,协会科学与规划,女权主义学者设想替代科学的方式 - 我们可以了解持续的,往往无法识别的HPS和ST的乌托邦维度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号