• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in history and philosophy of science >Improving philosophical dialogue interventions to better resolve problematic value pluralism in collaborative environmental science
【24h】

Improving philosophical dialogue interventions to better resolve problematic value pluralism in collaborative environmental science

机译：改善哲学对话干预措施，以更好地解决协作环境科学的有问题价值多元化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Environmental problems often outstrip the abilities of any single scientist to understand, much less address them. As a result, collaborations within, across, and beyond the environmental sciences are an increasingly important part of the environmental science landscape. Here, we explore an insufficiently recognized and particularly challenging barrier to collaborative environmental science: value pluralism, the presence of non-trivial differences in the values that collaborators bring to bear on project decisions. We argue that resolving the obstacles posed by value pluralism to collaborative environmental science requires detecting and coordinating the underlying problematic value differences. We identify five ways that a team might coordinate their problematic value differences and argue that, whichever mode is adopted, it ought to be governed by participatory virtues, pragmatic resolve, and moral concern. Relying on our experiences with the Toolbox Dialogue Initiative, as well as with other dialogical approaches that support team inquiry, we defend the claim that philosophical dialogue among collaborators can go a long way towards helping teams of environmental scientists and fellow travelers detect their problematic value differences. Where dialogical approaches fare less well is in helping teams coordinate these differences. We close by describing several principles for augmenting philosophical dialogue with other methods, and we list several of these methods in an appendix with brief descriptions and links for further learning. Overall, the article makes three main contributions to the research collaboration and values in science literatures: (1) It deepens our understanding of problematic value pluralism in team science; (2) It provides actionable guidance and methods for improving values-oriented philosophical dialogue interventions; and (3) It demonstrates one way of doing engaged philosophy.(c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-NDlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
机译：环境问题往往超过任何科学家了解的能力，更少于解决它们。因此，环境科学中，环境科学的合作是环境科学景观的越来越重要的一部分。在这里，我们探讨了合作环境科学的不够认可和特别具有挑战性的障碍：价值多元化，合作者带来项目决策的价值观的非琐碎差异。我们认为，解决价值多元化与协同环境科学所带来的障碍需要检测和协调潜在的有问题价值差异。我们确定了五种方式，即团队可能会协调其有问题的价值差异并争辩说，无论采用哪种模式，它应该受到参与式美德，务实的解决和道德问题的管辖。依靠我们对工具箱对话倡议的经验，以及支持团队咨询的其他对话方法，我们捍卫了合作者之间的哲学对话可以走向帮助环境科学家的团队和其他旅行者检测到他们的有问题的价值差异。如果对话方式不太好，则在帮助团队协调这些差异。我们通过描述与其他方法增强哲学对话的几个原则，并在附录中列出了几种这些方法，其中包括进一步学习的简要说明和链接。总体而言，本文对科学文献的研究合作和价值作出了三项主要贡献：（1）它深化我们对团队科学的有问题价值多元化的理解; （2）它提供了可行的指导和改善价值观哲学对话干预的方法; （3）它展示了从事哲学的一种方式。（c）提交人2021年。由elsevier有限公司出版。这是CC By-Nc-Ndlicense（http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/）的开放式访问文章。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号