首页> 外文期刊>Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. A >Was Feyerabend an anarchist? The structure(s) of 'anything goes'
【24h】

Was Feyerabend an anarchist? The structure(s) of 'anything goes'

机译:Feyerabend是无政府主义者吗? “一切”的结构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The near consensus in the secondary literature on Feyerabend is that his epistemological anarchism, characterized by the slogan 'anything goes', was not a positive proposal but the conclusion of a reductio argument against his opponents (Lloyd 1997; Staley 1999; Munevar 2000; Farrell 2003; Tsou 2003; Oberheim 2006; Roe 2009). This makes anarchism a mere criticism rather than a substantive position in its own right. In this paper, I argue that Feyerabend held anarchism as a positive thesis. Specifically, I present two possible interpretations of anarchism: one where anarchism is entailed by Feyerabend's radical view of pluralism and another where scientists must be 'methodological opportunists', which Feyerabend held simultaneously from at least 1970. I then consider how these positions fare against the more influential criticisms of anarchism (Nagel 1977; Worrall 1978; Godfrey-Smith 2003). I conclude by suggesting two avenues to constraining a literal interpretation of 'anything goes' on Feyerabendian grounds. Crown Copyright (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:费耶阿本德(Feyerabend)的二级文献中几乎达成的共识是,以“一切都行”为口号的他的认识论无政府主义不是一个积极的建议,而是对他的反对者进行还原论证的结论(Lloyd 1997; Staley 1999; Munevar 2000; Farrell 2003; Tsou 2003; Oberheim 2006; Roe 2009)。这使得无政府主义本身仅是批评而不是实质性立场。在本文中,我认为费耶阿本德认为无政府主义是一个积极的论点。具体而言,我提出了两种对无政府主义的可能解释:一种是费耶阿本德激进的多元主义观点所引起的无政府主义,另一种是科学家必须是至少在1970年费耶阿本本德同时担任的“方法主义机会主义者”。然后,我考虑这些立场如何与无政府主义相对立。对无政府主义的影响更大的批评(Nagel 1977; Worrall 1978; Godfrey-Smith 2003)。最后,我提出了两种方法来限制费耶拉本迪安对“一切”的字面解释。 Crown版权所有(C)2017,由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号