• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. A >Overlapping ontologies and Indigenous knowledge. From integration to ontological self-determination
【24h】

Overlapping ontologies and Indigenous knowledge. From integration to ontological self-determination

机译：重叠的本体和土著知识。从整合到本体的自决

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Current controversies about knowledge integration reflect conflicting ideas of what it means to "take Indigenous knowledge seriously". While there is increased interest in integrating Indigenous and Western scientific knowledge in various disciplines such as anthropology and ethnobiology, integration projects are often accused of recognizing Indigenous knowledge only insofar as it is useful for Western scientists. The aim of this article is to use tools from philosophy of science to develop a model of both successful integration and integration failures. On the one hand, I argue that cross-cultural recognition of property clusters leads to an ontological overlap that makes knowledge integration often epistemically productive and socially useful. On the other hand, I argue that knowledge integration is limited by ontological divergence. Adequate models of Indigenous knowledge will therefore have to take integration failures seriously and I argue that integration efforts need to be complemented by a political notion of ontological self-determination. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：当前有关知识整合的争论反映了“认真对待土著知识”的含义相互矛盾的想法。尽管越来越有兴趣将土著和西方科学知识整合到人类学和民族生物学等各个学科中，但人们常常指责融合项目仅在对西方科学家有用的情况下才承认土著知识。本文的目的是使用科学哲学中的工具来开发成功集成和集成失败的模型。一方面，我认为对财产集群的跨文化认可导致了本体论的重叠，这使得知识整合常常在认识论上具有生产性和社会实用性。另一方面，我认为知识整合受到本体论分歧的限制。因此，适当的土著知识模型将必须认真对待整合失败，我认为，整合努力需要以本体论自决的政治概念加以补充。 （C）2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号