...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. A >Border cases between autonomy and relevance Economic sciences in Berlin-A natural experiment
【24h】

Border cases between autonomy and relevance Economic sciences in Berlin-A natural experiment

机译：自治与相关性之间的边界案例柏林的自然科学实验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The faculty of economics at today's Humboldt University in Berlin, as no other institution of economics, has witnessed three radical ruptures in its history: in 1933, National Socialism replaced the pluralism prevailing in the Weimar Republic by imposing a "German economics"; after WWII, GDR authorities replaced this NS regime by imposing a Marxist imperative, which after the fall of the wall was replaced by the Western standards of neoclassical economics. In reconstructing these three reforms, institutional history can serve as a context in which questions about the political nature of economic knowledge can be answered that remain speculative in a conceptual context. I thus present a natural experiment in the political epistemology of economics: How do economists respond to, resist, and stabilize, changing political regimes? How do economists renegotiate the autonomy of economic knowledge given changing demands as of its social task? Among others, I show that contrary to Robert Merton's old, but still widely held thesis in political epistemology that the values of science are compatible only with democratic regimes the totalitarian and authoritarian regimes created better conditions for methodological pluralism in economics than democratic society. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：今天的柏林洪堡大学经济学系，没有其他经济学机构，见证了其历史上的三场根本性断裂：1933年，国家社会主义强加了“德国经济学”，取代了魏玛共和国盛行的多元主义。第二次世界大战后，GDR当局通过强加了马克思主义的命令来取代了这个NS政权，在柏林墙倒塌后被西方的新古典经济学标准所取代。在重构这三项改革时，制度历史可以作为一种背景，在这种背景下，可以回答有关经济知识的政治性质的问题，这些问题在概念上仍然是投机性的。因此，我在经济学的政治认识论中提出了一个自然的实验：经济学家如何应对，抵抗和稳定不断变化的政治制度？在社会需求不断变化的情况下，经济学家如何重新协商经济知识的自主权？除其他外，我表明，与罗伯特·默顿（Robert Merton）的旧观点相反，但在政治认识论中仍然广为接受的论点是，科学的价值仅与民主政体兼容，极权主义和专制政权为经济学方法论多元化创造了比民主社会更好的条件。 （C）2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号