首页> 外文期刊>Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. A >The silence of the norms: The missing historiography of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
【24h】

The silence of the norms: The missing historiography of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

机译:规范的沉默:《科学革命的结构》中缺少的史学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

History has been disparaged since the late 19th century for not conforming to norms of scientific explanation. Nonetheless, as a matter of fact a work of history upends the regnant philosophical conception of science in the second part of the 20th century. Yet despite its impact, Kuhn's Structure has failed to motivate philosophers to ponder why works of history should be capable of exerting rational influence on an understanding of philosophy of science. But all this constitutes a great irony and a mystery. The mystery consists of the persistence of a complete lack of interest in efforts to theorize historical explanation. Fundamental questions regarding why an historical account could have any rational influence remain not merely unanswered, but unasked. The irony arises from the fact that analytic philosophy of history went into an eclipse where it remains until this day just around the time that the influence of Kuhn's great work began to make itself felt. This paper highlights puzzles long ignored regarding the challenges a work of history managed to pose to the epistemic authority of science, and what this might imply generally for the place of philosophy of history vis-a-vis the problems of philosophy.
机译:自19世纪末以来,历史因不符合科学解释规范而被贬低。然而,事实上,历史著作颠覆了20世纪下半叶对科学的顽固哲学观。尽管有影响,但库恩的《结构》仍未能激发哲学家思考为什么历史著作应该能够对科学哲学的理解施加理性的影响。但这一切构成了极大的讽刺和神秘感。谜团在于对历史解释理论化的努力完全缺乏兴趣。关于为什么历史记录可以产生任何理性影响的根本问题不仅没有得到回答,而且还没有得到解决。具有讽刺意味的是,历史分析哲学陷入了日蚀,直到今天,直到库恩伟大著作的影响开始显现出来的那一天,它才得以存在。本文着重介绍了长期以来被人们忽视的难题,这些难题对于历史著作设法对科学的认知权威提出了挑战,以及这对于历史哲学相对于哲学问题的普遍意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号