首页> 外文期刊>Studies in history and philosophy of science >Bias And Values In Scientific Research
【24h】

Bias And Values In Scientific Research

机译:科研的偏见和价值观

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When interests and preferences of researchers or their sponsors cause bias in experimental design, data interpretation or dissemination of research results, we normally think of it as an epistemic shortcoming. But as a result of the debate on science and values, the idea that all 'extra-scientific' influences on research could be singled out and separated from pure science is now widely believed to be an illusion. I argue that nonetheless, there are cases in which research is rightfully regarded as epistemologically deficient due to the influence of preferences on its outcomes. I present examples from biomedical research and offer an analysis in terms of social epistemology.
机译:当研究人员或其赞助者的兴趣和偏好导致实验设计,数据解释或研究结果的传播出现偏差时,我们通常将其视为认知缺陷。但是,由于对科学和价值观念的辩论,现在认为可以将对研究的所有“超科学”影响都分离出来并与纯科学分开的想法现在被认为是一种幻想。我认为,尽管如此,在某些情况下,由于偏好对其结果的影响,有理由认为研究在认识论上是不足的。我提供了生物医学研究的实例,并就社会认识论进行了分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号